132 Lincoln v. Power, 151 U. S. 436, 442, 14 Sup. Ct. 387, 38 L. Ed. 224... Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. 223 U. S. 349, 32 Sup. Ct. 271, 56 L. 182 Fed. 926, 927, 929.. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 31 Sup. Ct. 337, 55 L. Ed. 369, Ann. 1912C, 160... Ling Su Fan v. U. S., 218 U. S. 302, 308, 31 Sup. Ct. 21, 54 L. Ed. 1049, 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1176 421 Litchfield v. Register and Receiver, 9 Wall. 575, 578, 19 L. Ed. 681... Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 50, 51, 52, 30 Sup. Ct. 676, 54 L. Ed. 921, 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 84.. 518 .21, 337 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467, 482, 31 Sup. Ct. 265, 270, 55 L. Ed. 297, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 671.. 229, 414 378 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Parker, 242 U. S. 13, 37 Sup. Ct. 4, 61 L. Ed. 119.. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. U. S., 238 U. S. 1, 11, 35 Sup. Ct. 696, 59 L. Ed. 1177. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 234 U. S. 369, 34 Sup. Ct. 810, 58 L. Ed. 1356; 237 U. S. 300, 35 Sup. Ct. 598, 59 L. Ed. 965; 207 Fed. 1, 5, 124 C. C. A. 573; 233 Fed. 82, 147 C. C. A. 152; 252 Fed. 29, 164 C. C. A. 141 ..5, 18, 134, 514, 515 Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46, 51, 34 Sup. Ct. 739, 58 L. Ed. 1202.. ...97, 317 Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co., 242 U. S. 638, 37 Sup. Ct. 111, 61 L. Ed. 540; 248 U. S. 139, 145, 149, 39 Sup. Ct. 53, 63 L. Ed. 170.. ..54, 292, 293, 446 Luke v. Hill, 137 Ga. 159, 73 S. E. 345, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 559... 263 119 541 Lincoln, Ed. 466; .455, 456 Cas. Looney v. Crane Co., 245 U. S. 178, 188, 38 Sup. Ct. 85, 62 L. Ed. 230.. McCluskey v. Marysville & N. R. Co., 243 U. S. 36, 37 Sup. Ct. 374, 61 L. Ed. 578. McCoach v. Pratt, 236 U. S. 562, 35 Sup. Ct. 421, 59 L. Ed. 720... 244 .25, 524 Louisiana v. New Orleans, 109 U. S. 285, 287, 48 McDaniel v. Holland, 230 Fed. 945, 948-950, 145 C. C. A. 139. .199, 200 McDearmott Commission Co. v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 146 Fed. 961, 77 C. C. A. 479, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889, 8 Ann. Cas. 759... 77 McDermott v. Severe, 202 U. S. 600, 610, 26 Sup. Ct. 709, 50 L. Ed. 1162.. ...107, 533 McDermott v. Wisconsin, 228 U. S. 115, 130, 131, 132, 136, 33 Sup. Ct. 431, 57 L. Ed. 754, 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 984, Ann. Cas. 1915A, 39..125, 127, 330 McDougal v. McKay, 237 U. S. 372, 35 Sup. Ct. 605, 59 L. Ed. 1001. 66 ..414, 415, 416 McComas v. Northern Pac. R. Co., 82 Or. 639, 161 Pac. 562, 162 Pac. 862.. McCormick Mach. Co. v. Aultman, 169 U. S. 606, 611, 18 Sup. Ct. 443, 42 L. Ed. 875.. McCray v. U. S., 195 U. S. 27, 24 Sup. Ct. 769, 49 L. Ed. 78, 1 Ann. Cas. 561.. McCrum, In re, 214 Fed. 207, 213, 130 C. C. A. 264 McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 421, 436, 4 L. Ed. 579. .47, 166, 447 McCune v. Essig, 199 U. S. 382, 390, 26 Sup. Ct. 78, 50 L. Ed. 237. 546 279 216 241 Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor, 184 U. S. 18, 22 Sup. Ct. 293, 46 L. Ed. 413. 264 McGowan V. Columbia River Packers' Ass'n, 245 U. S. 352, 38 Sup. Ct. 129, 62 L. Ed. 342.... 23 McGowan v. Maclay, 16 Mont. 234, 40 Pac. 602.. 234 363 McLean v. Denver & R. G. R. Co., 203 U. S. 38, 27 Sup. Ct. 1, 51 L. Ed. 78.. 321 McLean v. Fleming, 96 U. S. 245, 251, 254, 24 L. Ed. 828... .50, 51, 52 McLean v. U. S., 226 U. S. 374, 378, 33 Sup. Ct. 122, 57 L. Ed. 260. .341, 465 McLemore v. Express Oil Co., 158 Cal. 559, 562, 563, 112 Pac. 59, 139 Am. St. Rep. 147.... .310, 311 McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661, 12 Sup. Ct. 118, 35 L. Ed. 893.. McNamara v. Washington Terminal Co., 37 App. D. C. 384, 394.. 159 286 Macon Grocery Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 215 U. S. 501, 30 Sup. Ct. 184, 54 L. Ed. 300 480 McVeigh v. U. S., 11 Wall. 259, 267, 20 L. Ed. 80 Madera Water Works v. Madera, 228 U. S. 454, 33 Sup. Ct. 571, 57 L. Ed. 915... Magee Furnace Co. v. Le Barron, 127 Mass. 115.. Magnolia v. Marshall, 39 Miss. 109.. 423 Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U. S. 283, 293, 18 Sup. Ct. 594, 42 L. Ed. 1037... 67 Male v. Atchison, etc., R. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 36 Sup. Ct. 351, 60 L. Ed. 544.. Mallinckrodt Works v. State of Missouri ex rel. Jones, 238 U. S. 41, 54, 35 Sup. Ct. 671, 59 L. Ed. 1132. 243 Malone v. Cohn, 236 Fed. 882, 150 C. C. A. 144.. 141 Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137, 34 Sup. Ct. 874, 58 L. Ed. 1245.. Milwaukee Electric Ry. & Light Co. v. Railroad Miami Co. v. Dayton, 92 Ohio St. 215, 110 N. E. 726 24 2 Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. 589, 592, 594, 18 Sup. Ct. 208, 42 L. Ed. 591.. 548 Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 219 U. S. 152, 157, 39 Sup. Ct. 227, 63 L. Ed. 527; 108 Tex. 110, 111, 185 S. W. 561.. ..229, 556, 559 Miller v. Chrisman, 140 Cal. 440, 447, 73 Pac. 1083, 74 Pac. 444, 98 Am. St. Rep. 63.. 310 Miller v. Connor, 250 Mo. 677, 684, 157 S. W. 81 337 Miller v. Strahl, 239 U. S. 426, 434, 36 Sup. Ct. 147, 60 L. Ed. 364.. 560 79 100 543 134, 135, 191, 490 Manigault v. Springs, 199 U. S. 473, 480, 26 Sup. Ct. 127, 130, 50 L. Ed. 274... Manro v. Almeida, 10 Wheat. 473, 486, 6 L. Ed. 369 Minerals Separation v. Hyde, 242 U. S. 261, 37 Sup. Ct. 82, 61 L. Ed. 286; (D. C.) 207 Fed. 118 223 956 Minerals Separation v. Miami Copper Co., 244 Fed. 752, 157 C. C. A. 200; (D. C.) 237 Fed. 609 496 Minneapolis, etc., R. Co. v. Doughty, 208 U. S. 31 251, 28 Sup. Ct. 291, 52 L. Ed. 474.. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Gotschall, 244 U. S. 66, 37 Sup. Ct. 598, 61 L. Ed. 995.. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 193 377 U. S. 53, 24 Sup. Ct. 396, 48 L. Ed. 614.. Minnesota v. Barber, 136 U. S. 313, 319, 10 Sup. Ct. 862, 34 L. Ed. 455.. 496 370 345 321 51 Minnesota v. Lane, 247 U. S. 243, 250, 38 Sup. Ct. 508, 62 L. Ed. 1098. 299 Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co., 184 U. S. 199, 22 Sup. Ct. 308, 46 L. Ed. 499.. Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U. S. 352, 399, 419, 33 Sup. Ct. 729, 739, 57 L. Ed. 1511, 48 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1151, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 18.. ..145, 146, 377 Mirzan, Ex parte, 119 U. S. 584, 7 Sup. Ct. 341, 30 L. Ed. 513.. .132, 338 Mississippi Railroad Commission v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 225 U. S. 272, 279, 32 Sup. Ct. 756, 56 L. Ed. 1087. 374 Missouri v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R., 241 U. S. 533, 538, 539, 36 Sup. Ct. 715, 60 L. Ed. 1148... 242, 243 Missouri v. Illinois, 200 U. S. 496, 521, 522, 26 Sup. Ct. 268, 50 L. Ed. 572.. 34 371 229, 230 Matteson v. Dent, 170 U. S. 521, 530, 20 Sup. Ct. 419, 44 L. Ed. 571.. 438 Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Cade, 233 U. S. 642, 649, 650, 34 Sup. Ct. 678, 58 L. Ed. 1135.. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Haber, 169 U. S. 613, 623, 18 Sup. Ct. 488, 42 L. Ed. 878.. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Harriman, 227 U. S. 657, 670, 672, 673, 33 Sup. Ct. 397, 57 L. Ed. ..402, 518 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Sealy, 248 U. S. 365, 39 Sup. Ct. 97, 63 L. Ed. 296. 446 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Ward, 244 U. S. 383, 37 Sup. Ct. 617, 61 L. Ed. 1213.. 229 404 518 Meeker v. R. R., 236 U. S. 412, 35 Sup. Ct. 328, 59 L. Ed. 644, Ann. Cas. 1916B, 691.. Meier v. St. Louis, 180 Mo. 391, 409, 79 S. W. 955 201 Memphis St. R. Co. v. Moore, 243 U. S. 299, 301, 37 Sup. Ct. 273, 61 L. Ed. 733... Menendez v. Holt, 128 U. S. 514, 9 Sup. Ct. 143, 32 L. Ed. 526.. 531 17 Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. Schnoutz, 245 U. S. 641, 38 Sup. Ct. 221, 62 L. Ed. 527... 518 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 278, 279, 30 Sup. Ct. 330, 54 L. Ed. 472... Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Nebraska, 217 U. S. 196, 30 Sup. Ct. 461, 54 L. Ed. 727, 18 Ann. Cas. 989 .344, 345 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Omaha, 235 U. S. 121, 35 Sup. Ct. 82, 59 L. Ed. 157. 451 345 New Orleans v. Warner, 175 U. S. 120, 130, 20 478 Ed. Montana Min. Co. v. St. Louis Min. & Mill. Co. 516 223 .71, 80 168, 203 .74, 79 279, ..74, 79 181 499 Morison v. Moat, 9 Hare, 241, 258.. ..173, 174 Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S. 113, 24 L. Ed. 77.. 118 332 New Orleans Flour Inspectors v. Glover, 160 U. New Orleans & N. E. R. Co. v. Hanna (Miss.) 475 368 New Orleans & N. E. R. Co. v. Harris, 247 U. 486 New York Cent. R. Co. v. Carr, 238 U. S. 260, 451 98 110 434 98 ..174, 530 New York, etc., R. Co. v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 21, 182, 386, 391 556, 14 Sup. Ct. 437, 38 L. Ed. 269.. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Dunlevy, 241 U. S. 518, 522, 523, 36 Sup. Ct. 613, 60 L. Ed. 1140... New York, P. & N. R. Co. v. Peninsular Exchange, 240 U. S. 34, 41, 42, 36 Sup. Ct. 230, 60 L. Ed. 511, L. R. A. 1917A, 193. New York & Chicago Grain & Stock Exch. v. Board of Trade, 127 Ill. 153, 19 N. E. 855, 2 L. R. A. 411, 11 Am. St. Rep. 107. New York & N. E. R. R. v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 556, 14 Sup. Ct. 437, 38 L. Ed. 269.. Nicol v. Ames, 173 U. S. 509, 515, 19 Sup. Ct. 522, 43 L. Ed. 786.. National Bank v. Kentucky, 9 Wall. 353, 359, 19 National Bank v. Yankton County, 101 U. S. 129, National Tel. News Co. v. Western Union Tel. North Carolina R. Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. 248, 259, 260, 34 Sup. Ct. 305, 58 L. Ed. 591, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 159.. 229 342 471 Newark Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. Newark, 242 270 Newcomber v. U. S., 51 Ct. Cl. 408.. .361, 464 New England Awl & Needle Co. v. Marlborough Awl & Needle Co., 168 Mass. 154, 156, 46 N. E. 386, 60 Am. St. Rep. 377.... 401 New England, etc., Oil Co. v. Congdon, 152 Cal. 211, 92 Pac. 180.. 310 475 Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Musser-Sauntry Co., 168 U. S. 604, 609, 18 Sup. Ct. 205, 42 L. Ed. 596... 547 Northern Pac. R. Co. v. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 585, 593, 595, 35 Sup. Ct. 429, 59 L. Ed. 735, L. R. A. 1917F, 1148, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 1; 250 U. S. 135, 39 Sup. Ct. 502, 63 L. Ed.--. New Jersey v. Anderson, 203 U. S. 483, 27 Sup. Ct. 137, 51 L. Ed. 284.. 188 New Jersey v. Lovell, 179 Fed. 321, 102 C. C. A. 505, 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 988. 188 New Jersey v. Wilson, 7 Cranch, 164, 3 L. Ed. 303 130 16, 38, 345, 507 Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Sanders, 166 U. S. 620, 630, 17 Sup. Ct. 671, 41 L. Ed. 1139.. .342, 547 Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Solum, 247 U. S. 477, 481, 38 Sup. Ct. 550, 62 L. Ed. 1221. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Townsend, 190 U. S. 267, 23 Sup. Ct. 671, 47 L. Ed. 1044.. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. U. S., 227 U. S. 355, 33 Sup. Ct. 368, 57 L. Ed. 544... 450 48 300 481 New Lamp Chimney Co. v. Ansonia Brass & 236 263 Newman, Ex parte, 14 Wall. 152, 165, 168, 20 L. New Mexico v. Denver & R. G. R. Co., 203 U. Ohio R. R. Commission v. Worthington, 225 U. 244 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Hughes, 191 U. S. 477. .97, 108 532 269 Old Colony Trust Co. v. Omaha, 230 U. S. 100, Omaha Baum Iron Stove Co. v. Moline Plow 17 198 Pennsylvania R. R. v. Locomotive Truck Co., 198 475 Orchard v. Alexander, 157 U. S. 372, 383, 15 Sup. 410 Ore Concentration Co. v. Sulphide Corporation, 496 Oregon R. & Nav. Co. v. Fairchild, 224 U. S. .345, 382 433 Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Towers, 245 U. S. 6, 38 Orleans, The, v. Phœbus, 11 Pet. 175, 183, 9 L. Osborn v. Bank, 9 Wheat. 738, 867, 6 L. Ed. 204 166 .541, 542 34 People ex rel. Ryan v. Bleck wenn, 8 N. Y. 477 477 Beers, 20 How. 393, 401, 223 171 15 Panama R. Co. v. Bosse, 239 Fed. 303, 152 C. C. Perris v. Hexamer, 99 U. S. 674, 25 L. Ed. 308.. 78 396 211 Panama R. Co. v. Toppin, 163 C. C. A. 239, 250 211 Paper Bag Patent Case, 210, U. S. 405, 424, 28 51 Parish v. MacVeagh, 214 U. S. 124, 29 Sup. Ct. 556, 53 L. Ed. 936. Philadelphia, etc., Const. Co. v. Seymour, 91 U. 407 223 465 Park v. Duncan & Sons, 35 Scottish Law Rep. 378 542 Parker v. Riley, 243 Fed. 42, 155 C. C. A. 572... 405 Phillips & C. Const. Co. v. Seymour, 91 U. S. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 478 310 106 Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U. S. 45, Phoenix Bridge Co. v. U. S., 211 U. S. 188, 29 61 530 321 Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Erie & W. Transp. Co., 117 54 12 37 Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144, 34 Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of Hope, 127 Ark. 38, .172, 173 229 Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U. S. 169, 23 Sup. Pike v. Nicholas, L. R. 5 Ch. App. Cas. 251.... ..86, 87 Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, 462, 27 Sup. Pioneer Irr. Dist. v. Walker, 20 Idaho, 605, 119 249 ..37, 172 Patterson v. Pittsburg & C. R. Co., 76 Pa. 389, 394, 18 Am. Rep. 412.. 437 Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40, 13 Sup. Pipe Line Cases, 234 U. S. 548, 560, 34 Sup. Ct. 282 .3, 4 530 Peabody v. U. S., 231 U. S. 530, 34 Sup. Ct. 159, 58 L. Ed. 351. 399 Pearsall v. Smith, 149 U. S. 231, 13 Sup. Ct. 833, 37 L. Ed. 713.. 478 Peck v. Tribune Co., 214 U. S. 185, 190, 29 Sup. 449 414 Pittsburg & S. Coal Co. v. Louisiana, 156 U. S. 115 409 506 Postal Supply Co. v. Bruce, 194 U. S. 601, 24 Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Baltimore, 156 U. U. S. 692, 14 Sup. Ct. 1094, 38 L. Ed. 871...... 266 Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. New Hope, 192 U. S. 55, 24 Sup. Ct. 204, 48 L. Ed. 338 266 Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Norfolk, 101 Va. 125, 43 S. E. 207; 118 Va. 455, 87 S. E. 555..... 266 Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Richmond, 249 U. S. 252, 39 Sup. Ct. 265, 63 L. Ed. 590. 430 Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Taylor, 192 U. S. 64, 24 Sup. Ct. 208, 48 L. Ed. 34237, 266, 321 Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Tonopah & T. R. Co., 176 App. Div. 910, 162 N. Y. Supp. 1140.. 163 Potomac, The, 105 U. S. 630, 634, 26 L. Ed. 1194 54 Pratt v. Paris Gaslight & Coke Co., 168 U. S. 255, 259, 18 Sup. Ct. 62, 64, 42 L. Ed. 458...... 516 Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U. S. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. H. W. Bogen (C. C.) Fed. 915.... Price v. Illinois, 238 U. S. 446, 452, 35 Sup. 892, 894 59 L. Ed. 1400... Procter & Gamble Co. v. U. S., 225 U. S. 297, 293, 32 Sup. Ct. 761, 56 L. Ed. 1091 Prudential Assur. Co. v. Knott, L. R. 10 App. 142.. 33, 125, 126, 161 Rawitzer v. Wyatt (C. C.) 40 Fed. 609..... Read v. Mississippi County, 69 Ark. 365, 63 S. Red "C" Oil Mfg. Co. v. Board of Agriculture of North Carolina, 222 U. S. 380, 394, 32 Sup. Ct. 152, 56 L. Ed. 240.. 480 51 203 506 269 226 .37, 321 Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Co. v. United Thacker Coal Co., 248 U. S. 531, 39 Sup. Ct. 5, 63 L 210, 227, 230, 29 Sup. Ct. 67, 53 L. Ed. 150..172, 441 Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, 263, 6 Sup. Ct. 580, 29 L. Ed. 615.. 404 Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Auto Acetylene Light Co. (C. C.) 191 Fed. 90....... 79 Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Avery Lighting Co. (C. 161 Fed. 648..... C.) 79 Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Davis, 215 Fed. 349, 131 С. C. A. 491; (D. C.) 209 Fed. 917.... 79 209 79 522 Ch. 82 Richardson v. Boston, 19 How. 263, 15 L. Ed. 639 A. 220.. Pullman Co. v. Croom, 231 U. S. 571, 575, 576, 34 Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S. 18, 22, 25, 26, 11 Sup. Ct. 876, 879, 35 L. Ed. 613.... Riley v. Horne, 5 Bing. 217.... 190 .278, 280-283 Pure Oil Co. v. Minnesota, 248 U. S. 158, 162, 39 Sup. Ct. 35, 37, 63 L. Ed. 180. Riley v. Kelsey (D. C.) 218 Fed. 391. 405 321 Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch, 226 U. S. 192, 204, 33 Sup. Ct. 44, 47, 57 L. Ed. 84....126, 173 Robinson v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 222 U. S. Putnam Inv. Co. v. King, 82 Kan. 216, 107 Pac. 559; 87 Kan. 842, 126 Pac. 1093... Sup. Ct. 8, 13, 48 L. Ed. 73... Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U. S. 275, 281, 17 Sup. Ct. 326, 41 L. Ed. 715..... 223, 224 250 52 Railroad Commission of Nevada v. Southern Pac. Co., 21 Interst. Com. R. 329. Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 108, 32 Sup. Ct. 653, 56 L. Ed. 1004 376 N. W. 299.... Rosenberger v. Pacific Exp. Co., 241 U. S. 48, 50, 71 339 128 .228, 229 Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 162, 163, 33 Sup. Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47, 15 Sup. Ct. 266, Royall, Ex parte, 117 U. S. 254, 6 Sup. Ct. 742, Ruckman v. Cory, 129 U. S. 387, 389-390, 9 Sup. 241 240 338 179 Rainey v. U. S., 232 U. S. 310, 317, 34 Sup. Ct. 429, 58 L. Ed. 617.. 93 119 Ruddy v. Rossi, 28 Idaho, 376, 154 Pac. 977...... 46 Rakes v. U. S., 212 U. S. 55, 58, 29 Sup. Ct. 244, 53 L. Ed. 401..... 412 Ruthenberg v. U. S., 245 U. S. 480, 38 Sup. Ct. 168, 62 L. Ed. 414.... 200 253 Randall v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 109 U. S. 478, $32, 8 Sup. Ct. 322, 27 L. Ed. 1003. 541 Ryder v. Holt, 128 U. S. 525, 9 Sup. Ct. 145, 32 L. Ed. 529...... 51 |