Sidor som bilder
PDF
ePub

BRENNAN & Co. SOUTHWESTERN AGRICUL- PEDRO PEREA et al., Administrators, etc.,

TURAL WORKS et al., Petitioners, v. Dow- Appellants, v. GUADALUPE PEREA DE HABAGIAC MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

[No.

RISON et al. [No. 45.] 372.]

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Territory of New Mexico. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for See same case below (N. M.) 70 Pac. 558. the Sixth Circuit.

Mr. T. B. Catron for appellants. See same case below, 62 C. C. A. 257, 127 Mr. W. B. Childers for appellees. Fed. 143.

October 24, 1904. Dismissed for the want Messrs. A. E. Willson and Border Bow- of jurisdiction. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. man for petitioners.

661, 35 L. ed. 893, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Mr. Fred L. Chappell for respondent. Mcagher v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. October 17, 1904. Denied.

145 U. S. 608, 36 L. ed. 834, 12 Sup. Ct.

Rep. 876; Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. OsMINNESOTA MOLINE Plow COMPANY et al., Ct. Rep. 281; Haseltine v. Central Nat.

borne, 146 U. S. 354, 36 L. ed. 1002, 13 Sup. Petitioners, v. DowagiaC MANUFACTUR- Bank, 183 U. S. 130, 46 L. ed. 117, 22 Sup. ING COMPANY. [No. 377.]

Ct. Rep. 49.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit.

See same case below, 61 C. C. A. 352, 126
Fed. 746.

Mr. Ephraim Banning and Thos. A. Ban-| UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. R. F. Downning for petitioners.

ING & Co. [No. 380.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Mr. Fred L. Chappell for respondent.

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for October 17, 1904. Denied.

the Second Circuit.

The Attorney General, Solicitor General M. S. BUCKINGHAM, Trustee, et al., Peti- Hoyt, and Assistant Attorney General Mo

tioners, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHI. Reynolds for petitioner. CAGO et al. [No. 379.]

Mr. Albert Comstock for respondent.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the October 24, 1904. Granted.
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
the Sixth Circuit.

See same case below, 131 Fed. 192.
Mr. Wm. H. Carroll for petitioners.
Mr. Thomas B. Turley for respondents. F. AUGUSTUS HEINZE et al., Petitioners, o.
October 17, 1904. Denied.

BUTTE & BOSTON CONSOLIDATED MINING
COMPANY. [No. 223.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the OHIO BAKING COMPANY et al., Petitioners, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

V. NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY. [No. the Ninth Circuit. 382.]

See same case below, 61 C. C. A. 63, 126 Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Fed. l. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Mr. John J. McHatton for petitioners. the Sixth Circuit.

Messrs. John A. Garver and James M.
See same case below, 62 C. C. A. 116, 127 Beck for respondent.
Fed. 116.

October 24, 1904. Denied.
Messrs. Ephraim Banning and Thos. A.
Banning for petitioners.

Messrs. Charles K. Offield and Earl D.
Babst for respondent.
October 17, 1904. Denied.

EUREKA COUNTY BANK, Petitioner, v. IDA

K. CLARKE. [No. 326.] BUFFALO TIN CAN COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the

E. W. BLISS COMPANY. [No. 385.] United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the the Ninth Circuit. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for See same case below, 64 C. C. A. 571, 130 the Second Circuit.

Fed. 325. See same case below, 131 Fed. 51.

Messrs. J. C. Campbell, Oscar J. Smith, Mr. Herbert P. Bissell for petitioner. and A.. E. Cheney for petitioner. Mr. Thomas Thacher for respondent.

Mr. Alfred Chartz for respondent. October 17, 1904. Denied.

October 24, 1904. Denied.

!

MOBILE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Peti- | SEATTLE DOCK COMPANY, Plaintiff in Er.

tioner, v. CITY OF MOBILE et al. [No. 373.] ror, v. SEATTLE & LAKE WASHINGTON WA.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the TERWAY COMPANY et al. [No. 390]; CANUnited States Circuit Court of Appeals for NEL COAL COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. the Fifth Circuit.

SEATTLE & LAKE WASHINGTON WATER-
See same case below, 60 C. C. A. 689, 125 WAY COMPANY et al. [No. 391].
Fed. 1003.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the
Messrs. Frederick G. Bromberg and Eu- State of Washington.
gene H. Lewis for petitioner.

See same case below, 35 Wash. 503, 77
Mr. Harry T. Smith for respondents. Pac. 845.
October 24, 1904. Denied.

Messrs. R. A. Ballinger, J. T. Ronald, and

M. A. Ballinger for plaintiffs in error.
STUART R. KNOTT et al., Petitioners, v. Messrs. Julius F. Hale and Eugene Sem-

LOUISVILLE TRUST COMPANY, Receiver.ple for defendants in error.
[No. 387.]

October 31, 1904. Judgments affirmed,
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the with costs. New Orleans v. New Orleans
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Waterworks Co. 142 U. S. 79, 35 L. ed. 943,
the Sixth Circuit.

12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 142; Yesler v. Washington See same case below, 130 Fed. 820.

Harbor Line, 146 U. S. 646, 36 L. ed. 1119, Messrs. Alex. Pope Humphrey, J. P. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 190; Shively v. Bowlby, Helm, Helm Bruce, and W. D. Hines for 152 U. S. 1, 38 L. ed. 331, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. petitioners.

548; Allen v. Forrest, 8 Wash. 700, 24 L. Messrs. John L. Dodd, Aaron Kohn, J. C. R. A. 606, 36 Pac. 971; Mississippi Valley Dodd, and D. W. Baird for respondent. Trust Co. v. Hafins, 20 Wash. 272, 55 Pac. October 24, 1904. Denied.

54; and Seattle & L. W. Waterway Co. v.

Seattle Dock Co. 35 Wash. 503, 77 Pac. 845.
NATHAN C. JESSUP, Plaintiff in Error, v.

TRUSTEES OF THE FREEHOLDERS AND COM. CAESLEY C. Moses, Petitioner, v. UNITED
MONALTY OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON. STATES. [No. 381.]
[No. 25.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the ln error to the Supreme Court of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for State of New York.

the Ninth Circuit. See same case below in Court of Appeals, See same case below, 60 C. C. A. 600, 126 173 N. Y. 84, 65 N. E. 949, and in Appellate Fed. 58. Division, 64 App. Div. 525, 72 N. Y. Supp. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for petitioner. 312, 780.

The Attorney General, Solicitor General Mr. Charles M. Stafford for plaintiff in Hoyt, Assistant Attorney General Pradt, error.

and Felix Brannigan for respondent. Mr. Thomas Young for defendants in error. October 31, 1904. Denied.

October 31, 1904. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Cummings v. Chicago, 188 A. F. KENNEY, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. U. S. 410, 47 L. ed. 525, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep.

ALBERT LOUJE. [No. 386.]
472; Montgomery v. Portland, 190 U. S. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
89, 47 L. ed. 965, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 735. See United States Circuit Court of Appeals for
Southampton v. Jessup, 162 N. Y. 122, 56 the Ninth Circuit.
N. E. 538; Southampton v. Jessup, 173 N.

See same case below, 63 C. C. A. 584, 128
Y. 84, 65 N. E. 949; People ex rel. Howell Fed. 856.
V. Jessup, 160 N. Y. 249, 54 N. E. 682. Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and James

M. Ashton for petitioner.
MINNIE KILPATRICK, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mr. Albert W. Buddress for respondent.

CHOCTAW, OKLAHOMA, & GULF RAILROAD October 31, 1904. Denied.
COMPANY. [No. 30.]

In Error to the United States Circuit | INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Appel-
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. lant, v. NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA, & St.
See same case below, 57 C. C. A. 255, 121

LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY et al. [No. 46.]
Fed. 11.

Appeal from the United States Circuit
Mr. W. 0. Davis for plaintiff in error. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mr. J. W. McLoud for defendant in error. See same case below, 57 C. C. A. 224, 120

October 31, 1904. Judgment affirmed, Fed. 934.
with costs, on the authority of Southern P. T'he Attorney General for appellant.
Co. v. Seley, 152 U. S. 145, 38 L. ed. 391, Mr. Ed. Baxter for appellees.
14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 530, and case remanded to October 31, 1904. Dismissed, with costs,
the United States court for the central dis- per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor
trict of the Indian Territory.

General Hoyt for the appellant.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Appel- | Yazoo & MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD

lant, 0. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. HENRY [No. 83.]

TRUMAN. (No. 57.] Appeal from the United States Circuit In Error to the Circuit Court of Franklin Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. County, State of Mississippi. See same case below, 122 Fed. 800.

Messrs. J. M. Dickinson and Edward The Attorney General for appellant. Mayes for plaintiff in error. Mr. Ed. Baxter for appellee.

No appearance for defendant in error. October 31, 1904. Dismissed, with costs, November 14, 1904. Judgment reversed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor with costs, on the authority of Chicago, R. General Hoyt for the appellant.

1. & P. R. Co. v. Sturm, 174 U. S. 710, 43 L. ed. 1144, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 797, and cause remanded for further proceedings.

BIEGMUND LUBIN, Appellant, o. THOMAS A. WILLIAM M. MEFFERT, Plaintiff in Error, o. EDISON. [No. 66.]

E. B. PACKER et al., as THE STATE BOARD Appeal from the United States Circuit

OF MEDICAL REGISTRATION AND EXAMINA. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

TION. [No. 64.] See same case below, 58 C. C. A. 604, 122

In Error to the Supreme Court of the Fed. 240.

State of Kansas. Mr. Charles N. Butler for appellant.

See same case below, 66 Kan. 710, 72 Pac. Mr. Melville Church for appellee.

247. November 7, 1904. Dismissed for the

Mr. J. Jay Buck for plaintiff in error. want of jurisdiction, on the authority of

Messrs. 0. C. Coleman and Clad HamilMclish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661, 35 L. ed. 893, ton for defendants in error. 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Union Mut. L. Ins.

November 14, 1904. Judgment affirmed, Co. v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374, 40 L. ed. 461, with costs. Hawker v. New York, 170 U. S. 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 318.

189, 42 L. ed. 1002, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 573;
Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114, 32
L. ed. 623, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 231; Reetz v.
Michigan, 188 U. S. 505, 47 L. ed. 563, 23
Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; Gray v. Connecticut, 159

U. S. 74, 40 L. ed. 80, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 985. PHYLLIS E. DODGE, Claimant, etc., Peti

tioner, v. UNITED STATES. (No. 397.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

THOMAS J. SPARKS, Presiding Judge, etc., See same case below on first writ of error, et al., Petitioners, •v. FRANK C. GUTHRIE. 66 L. R. A. 130, 49 C. C. A. 287, 111 Fed. [No. 417.] 164, on second writ of error, 65 C. C. A.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the 603, 131 Fed. 849.

United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

the Sixth Circuit. Mr. W. Wickham Smith for petitioner. The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen

See same case below, 65 C. C. A. 427, 131

Fed. 443.
eral Hoyt for respondent.
November 7, 1904. Denied.

Mr. Henry Burnett for petitioners.
Mr. D. M. Rodman for respondent.
November 14, 1904. Denied.

PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY, ETC.,

Petitioner, v. SARAH GUYON, Administra UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. MORRIS trix, etc., et al. [No. 399.]

WHITRIDGE et al., etc. (No. 413.) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

the Fourth Circuit. See same case below, 64 C. C. A. 410, 130 The Attorney General, Solicitor General Fed. 76.

Hoyt, and Assistant Attorney General MoMessrs. Maxwell Evarts and Charles Page Reynolds for petitioner. for petitioner.

Messrs. Albert Comstock, William R. Mr. Wm. Denman for respondents. Sears, and A. B. Browne for respondents. November 7, 1904. Denied.

November 28, 1904. Granted.

FREDERICK H. SHELTON, Petitioner, v. GEORGE W. SAMPLE, Petitioner, 0. AMERI

AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW CAN SODA FOUNTAIN COMPANY et al. YORK. [No. 403.]

[No. 422.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

the Third Circuit. See same case below, 131 Fed. 210.

See same case below, 64 C. C. A. 497, 130 Mr. C. Berkeley Taylor for petitioner. Fed. 145. Mr. H. Gordon McCouch for respondent. Mr. Wm. G. Henderson for petitioner. November 28, 1904. Denied.

Mr. Joshua Pusey for respondents.

November 28, 1904. Denied. IDEAL STOPPER COMPANY OF BALTIMORE

CITY et al., Petitioners, v. CROWN CORK ARMOUR PACKING COMPANY, Petitioner, o. & SEAL COMPANY OF BALTIMORE CITY. METROPOLITAN WATER COMPANY.

[No. [No. 405.]

426.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

the Third Circuit. See same case below, 65 C. C. A. 436, 131 See same case below, 65 C. C. A. 335, 130 Fed. 244.

Fed. 851. Alessrs. Philip Mauro and Reeve Lewis Messrs. James Russell Soley and Frank for petitioners.

Hagerman for petitioner.
Messrs. Robert H. Parkinson and John C. Mr. Joseph Coult for respondent.
Rose for respondent.

November 28, 1904. Denied.
November 28, 1904. Denied.

J. W. TONEY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, o. STANLEY INSTRUMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFAC- MACON. [No. 214.] TURING COMPANY. [No. 409.]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the State of Georgia. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for See same case below, 119 Ga. 83,46 S. E. 80. the First Circuit.

Mr. John Randolph Cooper for plaintiffs See same case below, 133 Fed. 167.

in error. Messrs. Charles E. Mitchell, Wm. Hous- Mr. Minter Wimberly for defendants in ton Kenyon, and Henry B. Brownell for peerror. titioner.

December 5, 1904. Dismissed for the want Messrs. W. K. Richardson and Thos. B. of jurisdiction, on the authority of Meagher Kerr for respondent.

v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. 145 U. S. November 28, 1904. Denied.

608, 611, 36 L. ed. 834, 835, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 876; Haseltine v. Central Nat. Bank, 183

U. S. 130, 46 L. ed. 117, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. ATLANTA, KNOXVILLE, & NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SOUTHERN 49, and cases cited. See Charleston & w. c.

R. Co. v. Miller, 115 Ga. 92, 41 S. E. 252; RAILWAY COMPANY. [No. 415.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Augusta R. Co. v. Andrews, 92 Ga. 706, 19

S. E. 713. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

CHARLES F. DODGE, Appellant, v. GEORGE Mr. Charles N. Burch for petitioner.

ELLIS & JOHN J. HERLIHY. (No. 219.] Messrs. Ales. Pope Humphrey, W. A.

Appeal from the District Court of the Henderson, and L. Jourolmon for respond- United States for the Southern District of ent.

Texas. November 28, 1904. Denied.

Messrs. Wayne · MacVeagh, Frederic D.

McKenney, and J. Spalding Flannery for GOLDENBURG BROTHERS & COMPANY, Peti- appellant.

tioners, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 418] Messrs. Howard 8. Gans and Henry G.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Gray for appellees. United States Circuit Court of Appeals for December 5, 1904. Final order affirmed, the Second Circuit.

with costs. Ex parte Reggel, 114 U. S. See same case below, 64 C. C. A. 442, 130 642, 29 L. ed. 250. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1148; Fed. 108.

Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U. S. 80, 29 L. ed. Mr. Thomas H. Clark for petitioners. 544, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 291; Kohl v. Lehlback,

The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen 160 U. S. 293, 40 L. ed. 432, 16 Sup. Ct. eral Hoyt for respondent.

Rep. 304; Hyatt v. New York, 188 U. S. November 28, 1904. Denied.

691, 47 L, ed. 657, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 456.

:

UNITED STATES ex rel, FRANK B. EDWARDS, UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. GEORGE E. Lieutenant, etc., Plaintiff in error, v. WIL

CADARR et al. [No. 438.] LIAM H. TAFT, Secretary of War, et al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the [No. 301.]

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. In Error to the Court of Appeals of the The Attorney General and Solicitor GenDistrict of Columbia.

eral Hoyt for petitioner. See same case below, 22 App. D. C. 419.

No one opposing. Messrs. Henry A. Craig and J. W. Cath- December , 1904. Granted. arine for plaintiff in error.

The Atlorney General and Solicitor Gen-W. J. McCAHAN SUGAR REFINING COMeral Hoyi for defendants in error.

PANY, Petitioner, 1. STEAMSHIP "WILDDecember 5, 1904. Dismissed for the CROFT," etc. [No. 441.] want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the South Carolina v. Seymour (United States United States Circuit Court of Appeals for ex rel. South Carolina v. Seymour) 153 U. the Third Circuit. S. 353, 38 L. ed. 742, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 871; Messrs. H. L. Cheyney and John F. Lewis United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280, 34 for petitioner. L. ed. 700, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 114; United Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for respondent. States ex rel. Phillips v. Ware, 189 U. S. December 5, 1904. Granted. 507, 47 L. ed. 922, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 852.

DOMINGO FELICI et al., Plaintiffs in Error,

v. GEORGE W. WHITEHEAD. [No. 91.]

In Error to the Circuit Court of the BALTIMORE & OHIO COAL COMPANY, Peti

United States for the Southern District of tioner, v. COLONIAL TRUST COMPANY,

New York. Trustee, etc., et al. [No. 400.]

Mr. Henry M. Ward for plaintiffs in error. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

The Attorney General for defendant inerror.

December 5, 1904. Dismissed, per stipu. the Sixth Circuit.

lation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Mr. Harry B. Arnold for petitioner.

Messrs. Louis Marshall and John H. Hoyt for the defendant in error. Doyle for respondents.

SALT RIVER VALLEY CANAL COMPANY, ApDecember 5, 1904. Denied.

pellant, v. HENRY E. SLOSSER [No. 447]; MARICOPA CANAL COMPANY, Appellant, v.

MARTIN GOULD [No. 448]; GRAND CANAL JOSEPH B. BARTRAM et al., Petitioners, v.

COMPANY, Appellant, v. TOM BROCKMAN UNITED STATES (No. 428); BENJAMIN

[No. 449] H. HOWELL et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED

Appeals from the Supreme Court of the STATES (No. 429]; AMERICAN SUGAR RE- Territory of Arizona.

Mr. Charles J. Kappler for appellees.
FINING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNITED
STATES [No. 430].

No counsel opposed.
Petition for Writs of Certiorari to the

December 5, 1904. Docketed and disUnited States Circuit Court of Appeals for missed, with costs, on motion of Mr. C. J. the Second Circuit.

Kappler for the appellees. See same case below, 65 C. C. A. 557, 131 ST. LOUIS EXPANDED METAL FIREPROOFING Fed. 833.

COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STANDMessrs. John E. Parsons and H. B. Clos

ARD FIREPROOFING COMPANY. [No. 179.] son for petitioners. The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen State of Missouri.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the eral Hoyt for respondent.

See same case below, 177 Mo. 559, 76 S. December 5, 1904. Denied.

W. 1008.

Mr. Janies A. Carr for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Frank L. Shepard and Hervey S. NEW YORK BAKING POWDER COMPANY et al., Knight for defendant in error. Petitioners, v. RUMFORD CHEMICAL WORKS. December 12, 1904. Dismissed for the [No. 432.]

want of jurisdiction. Mutual L. Ins. Co. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 47 L. ed. 480, 23 United States Circuit Court of Appeals for Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; Turner v. Richardson, the Second Circuit.

180 U. S. 87, 45 L. ed. 438, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. See same case below, 134 Fed. 385. 295; Home for Incurables v. New York,

Messrs. Arthur V. Briesen and Paul | 187 U. S. 155, 47 L. ed. 117, 63 L. R. A. Bakewell for petitioners.

329, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 84; Layton v. Mis. Mr. Philip Mauro for respondent.

souri, 187 U. S. 356, 47 L. ed. 214, 23 Sup. December 5, 1904. Denied.

Ct. Rep. 137.

[ocr errors]
« FöregåendeFortsätt »