NICK GURVICH v. UNITED STATES. [No. | BENJAMIN F. MCCAULLY, Petitioner, v. 435.] On a Certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No appearance for Gurvich. UNITED STATES. [No. 651.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. See same case below, 33 Wash. L. Rep. The Attorney General for the United 306. States. Messrs. Arthur A. Birney and Henry F. Woodard for petitioner. May 1, 1905. On the authority of Rassmussen v. United States, 197 U. S. 516, ante, 514, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 514, the ques-eral Hoyt for respondent. tion is answered that the district court of May 15, 1905. Denied. the United States for the district of Alaska, division No. 1, erred in compelling the plaintiff in error to go to trial before a jury composed of only six persons. Announced by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller. The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen WILLIAM S. BRYAN, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See same case below, 64 C. C. A. 417, 130 Fed. 83. Messrs. C. C. Calhoun and S. T. G. Smith for petitioner. Mr. Ira Julian for respondents. CONSUMERS' GAS TRUST COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. BYRON C. QUINBY. [No. 637.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mr. Addison C. Harris for petitioners. Messrs. Ferdinand Winter and Alexander C. Ayres for respondent. May 8, 1905. Denied. FRANCIS H. DUEHAY, Petitioner, v. Dis- Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Mr. Samuel Maddox for petitioner. Messrs. A. B. Duvall and F. H. Stephens for respondent. May 29, 29, 1905. Denied. Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration and disposition of this application. D. G. FRITZLEN et al., Petitioners, v. BOAT- See same case below, 135 Fed. 650. Messrs. D. R. Hite and H. J. Bone for petitioners. Mr. James S. Botsford for respondent. LOUIS A. DARNAL, Petitioner, v. UNITED Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Mr. W. M. Smith for petitioner. May 8, 1905. Denied. STEPHEN A. RALLI et al., Petitioners, v. DI- Messrs. John F. Lewis, Francis S. Lains, WILLIAM H. STAAKE, Trustee, Petitioner, v. | IGNACIO ROSALES Y CUELI, Plaintiff in ErWATTS, ROBERTSON, & ROBERTSON, et al. [Nos. 656, 657.] Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. See same case below, 133 Fed. 717. Messrs. H. Gordon McCouch and Samuel W. Cooper for petitioner. Mr. S. Hamilton Graves for respondents. May 29, 1905. Denied. MARTHA RAPHAEL, Administratrix, etc., Petitioner, v. RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al. [No. 659.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ror, v. DOLORES MOYA Y RODRIGUEZ, Guardian, etc., et al. [No. 431.] In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, J. Spalding Flannery, and Wayne MacVeagh for plaintiff in error. Mr. George H. Lamar for defendants in error. May 29, 1905. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U. S. 149, 48 L. ed. 385, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210, 32 L. ed. 908, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 503; Filhiol v. Maurice, 185 U. S. 108, 46 L. ed. 827, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 560; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709, 41 See same case below, 65 C. C. A. 632, 132 L. ed. 1173, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 725; HarriFed. 12. son v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38, 43 L. ed. 63, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 742. Mr. Charles Locke Easton for petitioner. Messrs. Wm. Mason Smith, A. H. Joline, and E. M. Shepard for respondents. May 29, 1905. Denied. EDWARD W. SHOESMITH, Appellant, v. H. See same case below, on appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals, 135 Fed. 684. Mr. Wm. R. Payne for appellant. Mr. Gwynn Garnett for appellees. May 29, 1905. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661, 35 L. ed. 893, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324, 38 L. ed. 179, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 353; United States v. Jahn, 155 U. S. 113, 39 L. ed. 89, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 39; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 232, 48 L. ed. 161, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119. UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY. [No. 624.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. PETER PEARSON et al., Petitioners v. WILLIAM WILLIAMS, United States Commissioner of Immigration. [No. 622.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for The Attorney General and Solicitor Gen- the Second Circuit. eral Hoyt for petitioner. Mr. Robert D. Benedict for respondent. Granted. Mr. Eugene Treadwell for petitioners. The Attorney General and Solicitor General Hoyt for respondent. May 8, 1905. Granted. EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writs of Habeas Corpus and Certiorari. Messrs. Arthur A. Birney and Henry F. Woodard for petitioner. May 29, 1905. Denied. END OF CASES IN VOL. 25 INDEX. ABATEMENT AND Adoption by United States courts of state laws Of mandamus proceedings, see "Mandamus," ABSENTEES. Actions relating to particular species of property See "Mines and Minerals," § 1. Particular causes or grounds of action. Personal injuries, see "Master and Servant," Relief against monopoly, see "Monopolies," § 2. Due process of law in administering assets of, See "Ejectment." ABUTTING OWNERS. Assessments for expenses of public improve- ACADEMIES. Military academy, see "Army and Navy." ACCORD AND SATISFACTION. See "Compromise and Settlement"; "Release." Particular forms of special relief. Establishment and enforcement of trust, see Particular proceedings in actions. Particular remedies in or incident to actions. Review of proceedings. An accord and satisfaction results from the re- ACCOUNT. Claim on account against estate of bankrupt, ACTION. Bar by former adjudication, see "Judgment," Commencement of action as starting running of Jurisdiction of courts, see "Courts." ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW. ADJOINING LANDOWNERS. See "Boundaries." ADJUDICATION. Of courts in general, see "Courts," § 1. ADMINISTRATION. Limitation by statute, see "Limitation of Ac- Of estate of decedent, see "Executors and Ad- Actions between parties in particular relations. See "Master and Servant," § 1. ministrators." ADMIRALTY. Actions by or against particular classes of See "Seamen"; "Shipping." Admiralty jurisdiction of federal courts held Public laws in New Jersey are in force in the |