Perverse Midrash: Oscar Wilde, André Gide,and Censorship of Biblical Drama
A&C Black, 3 nov. 2004 - 180 sidor
Oscar Wilde's Salome and Andre Gide's Saul have been considered critically in the traditional contexts of authorial oeuvre, biography, or "thought." These plays have been treated with embarrassed respect, dealt with only because of the importance of their authors. That Wilde and Gide made use of biblical material seems to discomfit their critics; that they had done so at a time when biblical drama was prohibited has rarely been addressed. Traditional critical treatments seek to smooth over the plays' aberrant qualities. This study takes them seriously as aberrations and investigates Wilde's and Gide's claims that these plays are works of faith, by considering them as participating in the history of biblical drama.
Så tycker andra - Skriv en recension
Vi kunde inte hitta några recensioner.
Andra upplagor - Visa alla
abuses ancient appears argues asks audience authority banned become believe Bible biblical biblical drama called censor censorship century changes characters Christ Christian church claims concerned criticism cultural David death defenders demons desire drama effect England English experience expressed fact faith Farrar fear Gide Gide's Herod historians human ideas interest interpretation introduction John Jonathan king language later literary literature lokanaan London look material meaning medieval moral movement mysteries narrative nature nineteenth nineteenth-century observes origins passion performed perhaps period perverse plays popular present production prophetic published question reading refers reflect Reformation rejection religion religious represented revelation ritual Robertson Smith sacred Salome Samuel Saul Saul's scene scholars scholarship scripture seek seems sense spiritual stage story symbol theatre thing thought tion tradition translation understanding Ward Wilde Wilde's writing