 ... that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant nor that the employee assumed the risk of his employment, nor that the injury was due to the contributory negligence of the employee.  Workers Compensation: A Reference and Guideefter Peter Lencsis - 1998 - 173 sidorIngen förhandsgranskning - Om den här boken
 | 1895 - 914 sidor
...passed to the effect that a corporation or other employer should not avail itself or himself of the defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant. There is no logical reason why such a law should not be passed. The distinction at best was an arbitrary... | |
 | 1913 - 1314 sidor
...action in the courts for damages on account of such injury; and in such an action the defendant may not f this act. (6) The term "general order" shall mean and include such order made, un or that the employee assumed the risk of his employment, or that the injury was due to the contributory... | |
 | Joseph Asbury Joyce, Howard Clifford Joyce - 1903 - 1046 sidor
...Stat. 1887, cb. 270, cannot be invoked to relieve a case brought under Stat. 1883, ch. 243, on the defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant. Section 2, of the first mentioned statute, which gives a remedy to the widow or next of kin, instead... | |
 | 1918 - 1226 sidor
...employers to recover damages for injuries sustained in the course of the employment it shall not be a defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant. Gibson v. Kennedy Extension Gold Min. Co., Cal. , 156 Pac., 5U, p. 60 (1916). GEOLOGIST. LAWS 1853,... | |
 | New York (State) - 1913 - 36 sidor
...action in the courts for damages on account of such injury; and in such an action the defendant may not plead as a defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant or that the employee assumed the risk of his employment, or that the injury was due to the contributory... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1913 - 552 sidor
...during the past six years the railroad company in a suit for personal injuries can no longer set up the defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant, neither can they any longer set up the defense of contributory negligence, neither can they any longer... | |
 | Harry Bower Bradbury - 1914 - 1438 sidor
...prove freedom from contributory negligence nor may the defendant plead as a defense New York that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant...due to the contributory negligence of the employee. § 12. Compensation not allowed for first two weeks. No compensation shall be allowed for the first... | |
 | New York (State) - 1914 - 52 sidor
...action in the courts for damages on account of such injury ; and in such an action the defendant may not plead as a defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant or that the employee assumed the risk of his employment, or that the injury was due to the contributory... | |
 | New York (State) - 1914 - 142 sidor
...action in the courts for damages on account of such injury; and in such an action the defendant may not plead as a defense that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant or that the employee assumed the risk of his employment, or that the injury was due to the contributory... | |
| |
