Sidor som bilder
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][graphic]

§ 2.

Entered according to Act of Congréss, in the year 1837, by ~ ED WA R D HO P KIN S. in the Clerk's office of the District Court of Connecticut.


[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

MR. ChamBERs, in his History of the English Language and Literature, has made a slight reference to American contributions to the language and its literature; yet he seems to have had no design of informing his readers, on the general subject of authorship, in the United States. With the exception of a notice of three American writers, he has confined himself to an account of authors in the British Isles. This exclusion of the productions of American genius from his book, was doubtless in conformity with his original plan of bringing into view the English language and literature, as these are exhibited at home. It is not, perhaps, a matter of surprise, that with this intention, he has nevertheless, embodied in his ‘History,’ an account of the writings of the eminent individuals in the United States, whose names appear in his book: but it is justly a matter of surprise that having introduced these, probably by way of exception, he did not enrich his book with a motice of others. The disCernment or the candor which admitted that we have so great a philosopher as Franklin, so fine a prose-writer as Irving, and so ingenious a novelist as Cooper, might be supposed also to allow the metaphysical acumen of Edwards, the theological knowledge of Dwight, the poetic fancy of Bryant, or the philological skill of Noah Webster. Perhaps, too, Dr. Channing might have stood some chance of being acknowledged in the ranks of literary, philosophical criticism; Prof. Stuart as holding an able pen in sacred exegesis; and the authors of the “Federalist’ as having writon a political classic.

In a work otherwise excellent, and adapted, according to the intention of Mr. Chambers, to the purposes of education, it has been thought that *ch a deficiency should be supplied. Or if the omission above men*d cannot be charged on the author as a deficiency, considering the *re of his undertaking; yet it must appear, that such a work might P"Perly admit the notice of American productions of genius and taste, * these are truly ornaments of the English language, and constitute a *uable portion of the literature which that language contains. With such a view of the subject, the American editor of the present volume,

« FöregåendeFortsätt »