Ambiguity, Coping, and Governance: Israeli Experiences in Politics, Religion, and PolicymakingBloomsbury Academic, 30 okt. 1999 - 216 sidor Sharkansky asserts that the use of ambiguity and other forms of coping are more suitable than problem solving in dealing with certain kinds of public problems. However, there are costs as well as benefits associated with these less than perfect ways of policy making. Sharkansky's approach conveys both optimism and pessimism. The bright side is that ambiguity works; the dark side is not so much its disadvantages as the realization that many commentators and practitioners of the craft seem unwilling to recognize its advantages and appear unwilling to promote its use for problems where it might be most useful. |
Innehåll
Coping Is Humane as Well as Inevitable | 23 |
A Typology of Ambiguity in Policymaking | 79 |
Which Jerusalem? | 93 |
Upphovsrätt | |
6 andra avsnitt visas inte
Andra upplagor - Visa alla
Ambiguity, Coping, and Governance: Israeli Experiences in Politics, Religion ... Ira Sharkansky Ingen förhandsgranskning - 1999 |