Sidor som bilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

THERE were Two who loved each other,
For many yeares, till hate did starte,
And yet they never quite could smother
The former loue that warmed theire harte;
And both did loue, and both did hate
Till both fulfilled the will of Fate.

Yeares after, and the mayd did marrye
One that her harte had ne'er approued;
Nor longer could Clerke Rycharde tarry,
Where he had loste all that he loued;
To foraigne landes he recklesse wente,
To nourish Loue, Hate, Discentente.

A word, an idle word of Follye,
Had spilled theire loue when it was yonge;
And Hatred, Grief and Melancholy,
In either hearte as idle sprnng,
And yet they loued, and Hate did wane,
And much they wished to meete againe.

Of Rycharde still is Margaret dreming,
His image lingered in her breast;
And oft at midnighte to her seeming
Her former louer stood confeste,
And shedding on her bosom teares,
The bitter wrecks of happyer yeares.

Where'er he wente by land or ocean,
Still Rycharde sees Dame Margaret there;
And everie throb and kind emotion
His bosom knew were felt for her;
And neure newe loue hath he cherished,
The power to loue, with first loue perished.

Homeward is Clerke Rycharde sayling,
An altered man from him of olde;
His hate had changed to bitter wayling,
And loue resumed its wonted holde
Upon his harte, which yearned to see
The hauntes and loues of Infancie.

He knew her faithlesse, nathless ever,
He loued her. though no more his owne ;
Nor could he proudly nowe dissever
The chaine that round his hearte was thrown.
He loued her, without Hope, yet true,
And sought her, but to say adieu.

For euen in parting there is pleasure,
A sad swete joy that wrings the soule;
And there is a grief surpassing measure
That will not byde nor brook control,
And yet a formal fond leave-taking
Does ease the harte albeit by breaking!

Oh there is something in the feeling,
And tremblynge faulter of the hande;
And something in the teare down stealing,
And voyce soe broken, yet so blande;
And something in the worde Farewell
Which worketh like a powerful Spel.

These Lovers met and never parted;
They met as Lovers wonte to do,
Who meet when both are broken hearted,
To breathe a laste and long adieu;
Pale Margaret wepte, Clerke Rycharde sighed
And folded in each other's arms, they died.

Yes, they did die ere word was spoken,
Surprise, Grief, Love, had chained their toung,
And nowe that Hatred was ywroken,
A wondrous joy in them had sprung;
And then despaire froze either harte
Which lived to meete, but died to parte.

Clerke Rycharde he was buried low
In faire Linlithgow, and his Love
Was layde beside him there, and lo
A bonny tree did grow above

Their double grave, and broad it flourisht
Greene o'er the spot where first Love perisht.

THE CHAUCER WINDOW, WESTMINSTER ABBEY.- A memorial of Chaucer has been set up in Poet's Corner, immediately over his tomb. The design is intended to embody his intellectual labours and his position amongst his cotemporaries. At the base are the Canterbury Pilgrims, showing the setting out from London and the arrival at Canterbury. The medallions above represent Chaucer receiving a commission, with others, in 1372, from King Edward III. to the Doge of Genoa, and his reception by the latter. At the top the subjects are taken from the poem entitled "The Floure and the Leafe." On the dexter side, dressed in white, are the Lady of the Leafe and attendants; on the sinister side is the Lady of the Floure, dressed in green. In the tracery above, the portrait of Chaucer occupies the centre, between that of Edward III. and Phillippa his wife; below them, Gower John of Gaunt; and above are Wickliffe and Strode, his cotemporaries. In the borders are disposed At the base of the window is the name Geoffrey Chaucer, died A. D. 1400, and four lines selected from the poem entitled "Balade of Gode Counsaile:"

arms.

[blocks in formation]

From Fraser's Magazine. DEAN MILMAN.

[ocr errors]

THE loss which the death of the great Dean' will be to the thinking world is one difficult to measure precisely because of its depth and extent. His vocation was to vindicate the great principles of free thought beyond and independent of the religious controversies of the day, the heresy of one obscure parson, the fine clothes of another, or the power of colonial bishops to torment each other. These questions seemed almost petty to one whose mind comprehended the ranges of centuries, where he had seen them battled over again and again, varying only in the various dresses with which our different ages clothe the same thought.

In one sense a thousand years was in his sight a tale that is told. He seemed in his highest moods to be saying, 'Even you Liberals do not see how these questions come and go like the waves of the sea. I cannot care as much as you do for their small ins and outs; I know that the great tide is rising; I have done my best to help it on, and to show the world how in the course of ages it has been continually, if slowly, gaining ground. Now I am content to wait I have finished my share in the work.'

[ocr errors]

Strife to that calm intellect of his was so essentially antipathetic that he could not enter cordially into the struggle, and this prevented his having the immediate influence on the combatants which very inferior men attained; on the other hand, it will always make his works a storehouse for those who believe that the world cannot be doomed for ever to do and to undo its work, but must be intended to benefit by the mistakes and the experience of those who went before us a truth which we seem now somewhat in danger of forgetting. The past has weighed so heavily beforetime on the progress of the world, that we are tempted now to ignore its value.

would have liked better than his own, and though he did not grudge to his younger and more successful friend the succession to the mitred abbots of Westminster (a post which combines some of the power of a bishop with the freedom of a dean), yet he did not conceal that it would have pleased him for many reasons. I am the last learned man in the Church,' he is reported once to have said. Good parish priests, good men of business, with a fair knowledge of books and men, these there will be plenty of; no sinecurists; hard working pastors, but not learned; - indeed there is hardly room for the article.' If there were any doubt of the truth of his saying, let any one consider the impossibility of finding a successor to his varied knowledge. It was a curious illustration of the belief that learning is neither popular nor profitable, that the publisher of the History of the Latin Church (surely somewhat miscalcalating the feeling of the reading public, who, if they bought the book at all, would certainly not be deterred by the addition of a volume), persuaded its author to compress his matter: which, as the series of facts could not be curtailed, deprived the world of an immense amount of valuable illustration and detail in the great work.

His mind was singularly.judicial, impartial, and upright in its character. The credit which this most learned man desires to vindicate for himself in his modest preface, that his sole object is truth, truth uttered with charity,' coupled with a declaration, that where to him it has appeared unattainable,' he has given no opinion, unwilling to claim authority where there is not evidence.' His was one of the minds which are content to remain respectfully in doubt, where the absence of materials, or of opportunity to use them,' deprives them of a secure standing point, whereas in general the native impatience of the human mind disdains that fortitude of resignation which is implied in rejecting all but verified facts and verified conclusions.

[ocr errors]

The heresies of one generation become the commonplaces of the next; the History of the Jews is now called 'coulourless.' It was considered of so vivid a hue when first In some cases the passionless flow of his published, that its author's career in the history contrasts curiously with the picturChurch was stopped short at the mild re-esque account of the same scenes by a later pose of a deanery. He did not regret his fate; he was freer to speak what he thought. There was indeed but one post which he

historian, as, for instance, in that of the Council of Nicæa; but on the other hand, there is perhaps no finer instance of the

[ocr errors]

noble eloquence to which the great Dean Then follows a most interesting dissertasometimes (although rarely) rises, of the tion on the different ways in which the grand impartiality, and yet of the deep conception of the Deity suffers at the hands feeling which formed so striking a combina- of men,' either by over subtlety removing tion in his mind, than is to be found in his him too far from us, or impersonating him account of the Trinitarian controversy in into a merely human being. Among the that very chapter. After describing how, causes,' he says, which contributed to the for the first time, a purely speculative successful propagation of Christianity, was tenet agitated the populace of great cities, the singular beauty and felicity with which occupied the councils of princes, and de- its theory of the conjunction of the divine termined the fall of kingdoms and the sov- and human nature, each preserving its sepereignty of a great part of Europe,' he pro- arate attributes, on the one hand enabled ceeds: In morals, in manners, in habits, the mind to preserve inviolate the pure conin usages, in church government, in relig- ception of the Deity, on the other to apious ceremonial, there was no difference proximate it, as it were, to human interests between the two parties which divided and sympathies. But this is done rather Christendom. The Gnostic sects inculcated by a process of instinctive feeling than by a severer asceticism, and differed in their strict logical reasoning.' usages from the general bodies of Christians. He next gives an account of the extent The Donatist factions began, at least, with to which a sort of Platonism, of a more a question of church discipline, and almost oriental and imaginative cast than that of grew into a strife for political ascendency. the Athenian sage, had become universal; The Arians and Athanasians first divided the idea of the Logos, the connecting link the world on a pure question of faith. between the unseen world and that of man, From this period we may date the introduc- which had entered all the religions of the tion of rigorous articles of belief, which world; it had modified Judaism, it had required the submissive assent of the mind allied itself to the Syrian worship. Alexto every word and letter of an established andria, the fatal and prolific soil of specucreed, and which raised the slightest heresy lative controversy, and where it was most of opinion into a more fatal offence against likely to madden into furious and lasting God, and a more odious crime in the esti- hostility, gave birth to this new element of mation of man, than the worst moral delin-disunion in the Christian world. Different quency or the most flagrant deviation from sects, the Sabellians, and the Patripassians, the spirit of Christianity.'

He goes on to show how the controversy could hardly be avoided, when the exquisite distinctness and subtlety of the Greek language were applied to religious opinions of an Oriental origin. Even the Greek of the New Testament retained something of the significant and reverenţial vagueness of Eastern expression. This vagueness, even philosophically speaking, may better convey to the mind those mysterious conceptions of the Deity which are beyond the province of reason than the anatomical precision of philosophical Greek.

The first Christians were content to worship the Deity as revealed in the Gospel; they assented devoutly to the words of the sacred writings; they did not decompose them, or with nice and scrupulous accuracy appropriate peculiar terms to each manifestation of the Godhead.'

6

had put forward their heretical interpretations, but the question was now taken up by the intellectual masters of the age. The contest was no longer for mastery over obscure communities, but for the Roman world. The proselytes whom it disputed were sovereigns. It is but judging on the common principles of human nature to conclude, that the grandeur of the prize supported the ambition and inflamed the passions of the contending parties, that human motives of political power and aggrandisement mingled with the more spiritual influences of the love of truth, and zeal for the purity of religion.'

The doctrine of the Trinity, that is, the divine nature of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, was acknowledged by all. To each of these distinct and separate beings, both parties attributed the attributes of Godhead, with the exception of self-ex

[blocks in formation]

istence, which was restricted by the Arians found theological investigation; but Bernard to the Father. Both admitted the ante- would not spare them, and the objectionable mundane being of the Son and the Holy parts were read aloud in all their logical Spirit. But, according to the Arians, there was a time, before the commencement of the ages, when the Parent Being dwelt alone in undeveloped, undivided unity. At this time, immeasurably, incalculably, inconceivably remote, the majestic solitude ceased, the divine unity was broken by an act of the Sovereign Will, and the only begotten Son, the image of the Father, the Vicegerent of all the divine power, the intermediate Agent in all the long subsequent work of creation, began to be.'

aridity. The bishops, whose wits were quite unable to follow the flights of the audacious reasoner, still with unanimous chorus replied at the end of each proposition, "damnamus." As they grew weary they relieved their fatigue by wine; the wine and the weariness brought on sleep; the drowsy assembly sat on, some leaning on their elbows, some with cushions under their heads, some with their heads dropping on their knees. At each pause they murmured"damnamus," till at length some cut short the word, and faintly breathed "namus"—their orthodox horror continuing unwearied to the end.

Such was the question which led to all the evils of human strife-hatred, persecution, bloodshed. But, however profoundly humiliating this fact in the history of man- The world has made progress in the kind, and in the history of Christianity an seventy-eight years of his career, and it epoch of complete revolution from its gen- was as a mark how far the tide had risen, uine spirit, it may be fairly inquired whether quite as much as on account of any personal this was not an object more generous, more feeling, that he rejoiced in 1865 on having unselfish, and at least as wise, as many of been asked to preach at Oxford, and to those motives of personal and national publish his sermon, - that Oxford in which aggrandisement, or many of those magic he had been preached against, and in a words, which, embraced by two parties with manner ostracised, nearly forty years beblind and unintelligect fury, have led to the fore, for his History of the Jews, and where most disastrous and sanguinary events in his greatest work is now a text-book for the annals of man.' the period to which it belongs.

Dr. Milman concludes by giving credit 'to the opponents of Arius for a vague, and however perhaps overstrained, neither ungenerous nor unnatural jealousy, lest the dignity of the Redeemer might in some way be lowered by the new hypothesis.' How many of the disputants who use the word as a sort of missile have any clear idea of what Arian means according to this definition ?

Again, in a different line of thought, although it is somewhat singular how rarely the sense of humour which so strongly characterised the Dean's social intercourse found expression in his books, yet the quiet ironical touch which one would expect from his hand comes out occasionally with wonderful force, as in his account of the condemnation at Sens of Abelard's religious heresies when he had himself appealed to Rome: The martial unlearned prelates on the council vainly hoped that as they had lost the excitement of the fray, they might escape the trouble and fatigue of this pro

Why don't they attack me? that is my heresy,' he has been heard to say when the Holy Inquisitors of Convocation or Congresses or Synods have been worrying some helpless parson. But it was known that it would not answer to assault one so extremely well able to defend himself, and to set forth all reasons, historical, metaphysical, and moral, for the faith that was in him; one so little swayed by passion or prejudice, so correct, so learned, so patient and so wise.

Besides which, sheltered in such large and thick octavos from the observation of most of the reverend gentlemen who aspire to decide these questions for their brethren, if not for the public, such expressions of thought seem to pass unnoticed. It might indeed be well so far to interfere with the liberty of the subject to be ignorant if he pleases as to institute an examination in the Dean's nine volumes of the History of Christianity, before any Pope (with the belief at least in his own infallibility), in or

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

out of Convocation, presumes to offer an | Book of the Chronicles' of the religions of opinion on any matter therein discussed. our race? Difficult perhaps for him even It is indeed a misfortune to have lost the not to feel a touch of that contempt with man who had a right out of his own expe- which the great old communions of East and rience of both books and life to tell the West regard the disputes of our most insurising generation of thinking men, whose lar and most self-sufficient of Churches. minds refuse to run in the rut of Puseyism Whenever the scattered portions of his or Evangelism, that there is a philosophy work in the world of thought are collected, of religion which has survived the contests it will be seen, however, in how many dif of the Monophysites and Monothelites, the ferent ways he vindicated freedom, as in Nestorians and Eutychians, the heresies his paper read before the Church Comwith strange names born of the contact of mission on getting rid of the subscription Christianity with the ancient faiths of the to the Articles, which was published in this world both East and West, which he has Magazine, where he shows how the docdescribed so well- a faith which is common trines of the English Church are not only to both the Trinitarians and the Arians, the more simply but more fully, assuredly monks of the Thebaid and the comfortable more winningly, taught in our liturgy and. English rector. In recounting indeed that our formularies than in our Articles.' He History of Human Error' (which he lived goes on to trace how some of these were to complete, though Mr. Caxton' did not), directed against opinions now entirely obone would fancy that he must have become solete, that they are silent and ignorant nearly desperate if he could not have shown inevitably about those which are new, and his conviction that there was a unity deeper no safeguard or security against them,' that than all the differences which those good however justly and wisely it is said that men thought so important, a truth under all their blunders and blindnesses, and shortcomings of intellect and heart, which lives and grows with the world's growth, though the progress may be slow to trace, which belongs to all time and all nations, as the human expression of the infinite- a true glimpse, though it must be a dim one, of that God who has not left us without a witness of Him at any time; or, as St. Augustine words the same idea, that matter which is now called the Christian religion was in existence among the ancients; and has never been wanting from the beginning

of the human race.'

[ocr errors]

Again he was tolerant even of the intolerant, and loved to show how the beauty of Christianity could underlie even the most extreme opinions; the love of human nature which could survive Calvinism and Predestination in their most terrible shapes, Augustine and Luther, the Roman Catholic Jansenists, the Puritans, and the Methodists, showing that many of the best and noblest Christians could yet hold the most frightful and godless forms of faith. Such is the triumph of the Christianised heart over the logic of the Christian understanding.'

It must have been difficult with such evidence constantly before his eyes, to give even their legitimate value to the questions of vestments and candles, of discipline, and infinitesimally small heresies; of how far in short the mantle of the Church may be stretched in different directions by her discordant children. Have not these things been written' over and over again, in the

[ocr errors]

the eternal truths of Christianity shall never pass away, religious thought and opinion, and above all religious language, are not exempt from the great law of universal progression and variation.' He then enters on the different controversies of the last thirty years to show the utter inadequacy of Articles written in the sixteenth century to meet the religious wants and necessities of the nineteenth.' 'I am an old man,' he winds up, with touching emphasis, and fully sensible of the blessings of a quiet life. Still I am bound not to disguise or suppress my judgment.' I stand absolutely alone in moving this resolution. I know that I speak the sentiments of a very large and I think increasing body even among the clergy. But all my life I have kept aloof from party, and this is no party move. Liberavi animam meam.'

[ocr errors]

As he began so he ended. The value of the spirit beyond the letter; of the substance above the form; the truth under divers forms of error, the error mingled with what we take to be the truth. The passage from one of his earliest works has already been given; in his latest published sermon he says: Orthodoxy of creed? has that insured the orthodoxy of the Christian heart which breathes only Christian love? I am one of those who believe torturing our fellow creatures a worse heresy against the Gospel than the most perverse of those opinions of the miserable victims led by thousands to the stake.'

In the last chapter of his last work, he sums up with his characteristic calm impar

« FöregåendeFortsätt »