| Kentucky - 1916 - 804 sidor
...caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad or transportation company to which such property may be delivered, or over whose line or lines such property...transportation company from the liability hereby imposed ; and such contract shall be construed to be as between the shipper and the carrier to whom the goods... | |
| Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 sidor
...caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company to which such property may be delivered, or over whose line or lines such property...right of action which he has under existing law." Construing and interpreting this amendment, in the recent case of Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 800 sidor
...caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad or transportation company, to which such property may be delivered or over whose line or lines such property...right of action which he has under existing law." Section 9 of the act of 1916 relating to bills of lading, upon subdivision (c) of which defendant relies,... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 sidor
...declared value, made to adjust the rate, is not forbidden by the provisions of the Carmack amendment that "no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt...transportation company, from the liability hereby imposed." 2. What we have already said disposes of all the questions raised upon the motion for a new trial,... | |
| New York (State). Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1907 - 796 sidor
...caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company to which such property may be delivered or over whose line or lines such property...imposed: Provided, That nothing in this section shall de-~ der^^t'ing law prive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any n remedy or right of... | |
| 1907 - 396 sidor
...by any common car» railroad or transportation company to which such property may be delivered or of whose line or lines such property may pass, and no contract, receipt, rule or regfll tion shall exempt such con.mon carrier, railroad -or transportation company from I liability... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1911 - 710 sidor
...and by the very section of the statute itself which is under 'consideration, which section provides "that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder...right of action which he has under existing law." To hold as we are asked to hold by the plaintiff in error would be to hold that Congress had given... | |
| South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1916 - 644 sidor
...injury to such property caused by it or by any common carrier, * * * to which such property may be delivered or over whose line or lines, such property...rule, or regulation shall exempt such common carrier * * * from the liability hereby imposed." There was another amendment to the interstate commerce act,... | |
| 1916 - 506 sidor
...caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad or transportation company to which such property may be delivered or over whose line or lines such property...right of action which he has under existing law.'" Section S of the original Act provided in substance, that in case any common carrier, subject to the... | |
| 1916 - 502 sidor
...Carmack Amendment. What is meant by the language "caused by" taken in connection with the provision that "no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt...transportation company from the liability hereby imposed?" In Adams Express Co. v. Croninger,1 the Supreme Court declared : "What is the liability imposed upon... | |
| |