Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of ScienceIn this 1974 book a practising scientist and gifted expositor sets forth an exciting point of view on the nature of science and how it works. Professor Ziman argues that the true goal of all scientific research is to contribute to the consensus of universally accepted knowledge. He explores the philosophical, psychological and sociological consequences of the principle, and explains how, in practice, the consensus is established and how the work of the individual scientist becomes a part of it. The intellectual form of scientific knowledge is determined by the need for the scientist to communicate his findings and to make them acceptable to others. Professor Ziman's essay, being written in plain English, and requiring only the slenderest knowledge of science, can (and should) be read by any educated person; as he says 'all genuine scientific procedures of thought and argument are essentially the same as those of everyday life'. |
Så tycker andra - Skriv en recension
Vi kunde inte hitta några recensioner.
Innehåll
Preface page ix | 1 |
Science and NonScience | 13 |
Scientific Method and Scientific Argument | 30 |
Education for Science | 63 |
The Individual Scientist | 77 |
Community and Communications | 102 |
Institutions and Authorities | 127 |
Summing up | 143 |
149 | |
Andra upplagor - Visa alla
Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science J. M. Ziman Ingen förhandsgranskning - 1968 |
Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science J. M. Ziman Ingen förhandsgranskning - 1968 |
Vanliga ord och fraser
abstract academic accepted achieve activity allow already argument aspects attempt become believe chapter claim consensus continually contribution conventional course critical definition difficult discipline discovery discussion error essential evidence example exist experiment fact feel field formal further give hand ideas imagination implies important individual institutions intellectual interesting journals knowledge language less literature logical major mathematical matter means ment merely method mind nature notion objective observation one's opinion organization particular pattern perhaps Philosophy Physics possible practice present principle problem procedures professional published pure question rational reason referred scholarly scholars Science scientific community scientists seems sense significance social sort standards student successful suggested techniques theoretical theory things thought topics true understand University usually validity whole write
Hänvisningar till den här boken
Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Co-Evolutionary Revisioning ... Richard B Norgaard Ingen förhandsgranskning - 2002 |
Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions ... Max Boisot,Professor at Esade Max Boisot Fragmentarisk förhandsgranskning - 1995 |