Marijuana Decriminalization: Hearing Before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session ... May 14, 1975, Volym 3
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 2941 sidor
Så tycker andra - Skriv en recension
Vi kunde inte hitta några recensioner.
Andra upplagor - Visa alla
addicts Administrator alcohol Amendment American amount appears applied argument associated Attorney authority California cannabis cause cigarette Code Commission concern conclusion conduct CONGRESS consider constitutional contained Convention conviction costs Court crime criminal dangerous decision defendant discussion Drug Abuse Education effects enforcement evidence existing fact Federal Finally harm Health hearing held heroin important increase indicates individual interest involved issue Judge Justice lead legislation legislature less LIBRARY limited liquors major marijuana marijuana laws means narcotic obligations offense opinion penalties police possession possible present problem produce prohibition protection provides punishment question reason recent recommendations regulation Report rescheduling respect result Schedule sentence Single smoking social society statute substances suggested supra note Supreme Court tion tobacco treaty United users violation York
Sida 2255 - No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. As well said by Judge Cooley, " The right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity : to be let alone.
Sida 2445 - When the classification in such a law is called in question, if any state of facts reasonably can be conceived that would sustain it, the existence of that state of facts at the time the law was enacted must be assumed. 4. One who assails the classification in such a law must carry the burden of showing that it does not rest upon any reasonable basis, but is essentially arbitrary.
Sida 2073 - ... recognized the significance of man's spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone — the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
Sida 2637 - ... fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions...
Sida 2264 - If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution.
Sida 2268 - We have returned to the original constitutional proposition that courts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.
Sida 2467 - That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
Sida 2069 - If official power exists to coerce acceptance of any patriotic creed, what it shall contain cannot be decided by courts, but must be largely discretionary with the ordaining authority, whose power to prescribe would no doubt include power to amend. Hence validity of the asserted power to force an American citizen publicly to profess any statement of belief...
Sida 2669 - The ideas of natural justice are regulated by no fixed standard: the ablest and...
Sida 2652 - The Court talks about a constitutional "right of privacy" as though there is some constitutional provision or provisions forbidding any law ever to be passed which might abridge the "privacy" of individuals. But there is not. There are, of course, guarantees in certain specific constitutional provisions which are designed in part to protect privacy at certain times and places with respect to certain activities. Such, for example, is the Fourth Amendment's guarantee against "unreasonable searches...