...the Third District, and a further appeal has been prosecuted to this court. At the close of all the evidence the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, which the court declined to do, and the first reason urged as a ground of reversal is the...

...Lawton. Michigan; one of said cars was destined for Monroe, Michigan, and two to Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the defendant...of Lucas county. That court affirmed the judgment Opinion Per Curiam. of the trial court, and this proceeding in error is prosecuted in this court to...

...amount of said loss between said plaintiff and defendant." The amended answer was withdrawn and refiled. At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a • Opinion of the Court. verdict for the defendant on the first cause of action, and at the close...

...principal facts of the case. On the trial in the common pleas after the plaintiff had rested his case, the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant upon the case made by the plaintiff. This motion was overruled aud refused,...

...advised in the premises, finds that the court erred in refusing to grant the motions of the defendant to direct the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant; and the court further finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in this action; that defendant...

...refer to. The issues were tried to a jury, but when both parties had rested the defendant requested the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant upon the plea of former adjudication, and also upon the plea of failure of consideration, and further...

...operating an approaching train. Upon substantially the foregoing evidence relating to the accident the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor on the first cause of action. The court denied the motion and submitted the case, in so far...

...the defendant moved that the action be dismissed, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and that the court direct the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant. Discussion of the first two propositions involved in the motion is wholly unnecessary, for two reasons...

...direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, which motion was denied. At the close of all the testimony defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, which was likewise denied. At the proper time defendant requested certain instructions which...

...and thereupon the conductor commenced setting* brakes upon the second section. Upon the close of the evidence the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the company on the grounds that there was no evidence of negligence on part of the defendant,...