Sidor som bilder
PDF
ePub

As soon as Sylvia's infancy had expired, along with the neighbouring children, she was entrusted to the care of some famed old woman, hard by. Her proficiency, as in similar cases, was purely accidental, in unison with her tender conceptions and the capabilities of her governess; consequently, the education she received was very limited, and soon finished. As her bodily powers increased, some employment, different to “rearing the tender thought," was she to experience; and the moment Sylvia was capable of administering to the comfort of others, and reducing the necessities of her parents, she was placed in servitude. Whilst in this capacity, her conduct was marked with uniform propriety; and, to all appearance, | she preserved her character unspotted; | for what is more calculated to secure the esteem and eulogiums of our acquaintances, than the practice of honesty, industry, soberness, and integrity?

Prospects of success in business at becoming gloomy, Sylvia's father determined on repairing to, a sea-port town, about - miles distant thither the whole of the family removed; and as soon as an elegible situation presented itself, Sylvia entered again into service. In her new engagement, the same good conduct which characterized her at she determined at- she would not only persevere in, but, if possible, perfect : the respect of her mistress, the love of her fellow-servants, the esteem of her companions, and the good-will of all who knew her, seemed to predict, that ere long, her noble qualities and virtues would deservedly raise her above the necessity of menial drudgery, and place her in a more respectable sphere. These omens, as was anticipated, did not prove abortive; Sylvia's tolerable | person, and confirmed good disposi- | tion, were not long to be neglected or overlooked by the young men of A respectable tradesman became enamoured of her; and after the most satisfactory answers to his questions, relative to her character, &c, by mutual consent, together with those of their respective friends, they entered into the holy state of matrimony.

We will now just glance at Sylvia as a wife: United, at the blooming age of twenty-one, to a worthy man, with the brightest prospects before him; in

|

the full possession of domestic harmony; strife never entered the joyous circle; and slander and envy were alike strangers there; in a word, they were blessed with every enjoyment calculated to add permanency of bliss to middle" wedded life."

Thus were Sylvia and her happy partner;-but ah! how soon this bright horizon of imparadised bliss was to be overcast by the clouds of calamity. Sylvia, with the most torturing sensations, fancied she could discover a growing paleness, in the hitherto healthful countenance of her beloved husband : her suspicions, alas! were not groundless; little more than nine months after their union, she beheld him on the confines of eternity, wasting away under a devouring consumption. The disease increased, and before the departure of another moon, from the arms of his adored Sylvia his spirit winged its flight to joys immoral,

"Where nectars sparkle, angels minister,
And more than angels share, and raise, and

crown,

And eternize, the birth, bloom, burst of bliss."

YOUNG.

, were

How altered now the scene! Sylvia, the late happy Sylvia, at twenty-two a sorrowing widow! But the loss of her partner is only a prelude of future misery. Suffice it here to record, that the expectations of Sylvia's father, relative to business at not realized; and, agreeably to the suggestions of his friends, he quitted that town, and returned to his native village. Sylvia's residence was amongst the relatives of her deceased husband, at - ; but at intervals she visited her friends, and the spot of her nativity. During one of these visits, the fatal connexion commenced, which hurried her to a premature tomb. Mr. like the hovering hawk, espied her, and meditated her ruin. An interview was soon after contrived; and whether the unfortunate Sylvia was allured from the path of virtue, under the vain idea of becoming the consort of her professed admirer, the blandishments of ease, or the prospect of grandeur, she only knew; but,-is it possible?-Oh woman!-by credulity!--she became the kept mistress of this man of plea

sure.

و

at

Time rolled on,-witnessing the criminalities of sensual enjoyment ;-

but mark the sequel. That invaluable | not be said that the crime is so great, blessing, health, which, till now, had added perennial sweetness to the wretched Sylvia, began to decline; and, to all appearances, a similar fate to that of her husband appeared to threaten her. So it proved. A rapid consumption attacked her frame; and with quick steps it seemed to hurry her to an untimely grave. In her sickness I visited her. When I had passed the threshold, what were my sensations? what could they be? I had known the unfortunate victim from childhood, and watched her ascent on the ladder of both respectability and holiness; and I now beheld her precipitated from that summit into the vortex of despair. I asked her how she was? With a faltering and scarcely articulate accent, she answered, "Very poorly." My feelings were too acute to renew my interrogations. I hastened from the scene of wo; and in a few days, I heard the bell toll for the departed Sylvia! Her funeral, which soon followed, I silently witnessed, and read on the coffinplate, died 18-,

66

aged 27 years."

Reader! if thou be of the "softer sex," reflect on the fate of the unfortunate Sylvia. Remember, that the pursuit of virtuous objects is satisfying, and shall be rewarded; but the practice of sin affords only momentary gratification, whose end is death death eternal. If thou be of the other sex, reflect duly on the conduct of Mr. and from the misery he has entailed on the unhappy friends of Sylvia, resolve, with the divine assistance, to steer clear of that destructive rock; and not to listen to the suggestions of the prince of darkness.

[ocr errors]

THE STATE OF THE HEATHEN
CONSIDERED.

(Concluded from col. 831.)
JUNIUS. But you must allow, that the
heathen are very immoral; that they
commit crimes of the greatest malig-
nity; that murder and a thousand
evils are continually practised among
them.

Philo. With some, it is true; others have been noted for peaceable dispositions, and for hospitality towards strangers. But of those who have committed these irregularities, it can

as if it had been committed in a land abounding with light. Those who possess "not the (written) law, are a law unto themselves," and in proportion as the light is dim, the crime is lessened. Those who have many advantages have much to account for; those who have few, have less. The doctrine I contend for is simply this, that every man will be judged “according to the deeds done in his body," and according to the nature of the circumstances under which they were performed. By this method we see how the scripture generally, man's conduct in every case, and the justice of the Almighty, may harmonize. In the other view of the subject, you confound things that ought to be separate, and rend asunder that which ought to be joined. You make a man answerable at the day of judgment, because he had light, and you make him answerable, on the other hand, because he had no light; thus you judge the former punishable, and the latter punishable, and join opposites in the same class. If it be right to punish a man, who knowingly breaks a law, it is wrong to punish a man who ignorantly breaks a law, and this we get from the exercise of reason on the precepts of revelation, and the account given of the divine nature.

Junius. Is not the darkness of the heathen world in a great measure owing to the obstinacy of the people who will not admit the light?

Philo. In many cases it is, but not, I should think, in a place where the light of Christianity never shone. For instance, among the Esquimaux, who have lived in complete ignorance on this subject; among the various tribes of people in the interior regions of Africa, who have known nothing of a Supreme Being, to whom they were responsible for their actions; and among all those ancient nations, of whom history relates, that they knew not God, and had no idea of one great and universal Lord of the universe, who required them to form their actions according to certain laws. All these having no conception of the existence of a God, how could they serve him? And having no idea of a law, how could they regulate their conduct by it?

Junius. Perhaps these nations have had a little light; or perhaps their

forefathers had a great deal of light, and obscured or destroyed it.

Philo. If they had a little light, of course they will be judged by it. But if their forefathers committed a sin, what does that concern them? For "every man being judged according to his work," does not imply, every man according to the works of others. All the disadvantage produced must be something like that I have already stated, respecting the sin of Adam; it would leave them more deficient of heavenly light, and would entail on them a negative evil, rather than a positive one. How can we contemplate the proceedings at the day of judgment; and imagine some one called forward and interrogated on what was done a century before, by another whom he had never seen, and by whom he had never been aware that a crime was committed? Or, endeavour to picture to your imagination, a parent who should severely chastise one of his children, because another, who had lived and died previous to its birth, did something wrong? This is not like the conduct of our heavenly Parent. And men, when they attribute such actions to the Almighty, characterize Him as an unnatural parent, or an arbitrary monarch; and very coolly attribute to him what they would willingly avoid themselves.

Junius. Since you disapprove of the common notions, tell me your opinion of the state of the heathen, of the evangelizing of them, and of the real good which may be afforded as it regards this world and a future state.

Philo. My opinion is such as I have intimated in the course of my observations. In the first place, that God is just and good; secondly, that man is capable of acting; thirdly, that there always must be a fitness between the requisitions of the Almighty on the one hand, and the opportunities of the creature on the other; and fourthly, that there must be an agreement between the punishment inflicted by the Almighty, and the nature of the crime. As it regards these, general principles, applied to the heathen, I would intimate, that those who have a little light, so as to be conscious of the existence of a God, and of some necessary duties to be performed, must look around, and strive to find out the true mode of conduct. But if they unavoidably err, they cannot be judged for that

82.-VOL. VII.

error. If they seek to evade the guidance which they really possess, and knowingly commit acts contrary to what their notion of propriety teaches them, they will certainly be judged for this. If you increase their light, you in the same degree increase their responsibility.

Junius. Then, according to your creed, no benefit can result from sending the gospel to them.

Philo. Not exactly so. For if the scripture command it, we may reasonably suppose that some advantage will follow, or the command would never have been given. But because some good may result from this case, it does not follow that no good would exist in the other case. If any sort of injunction exist, we are bound to follow it; if we omit our duty, we shall be punished; not the heathen condemned, because we did wrong. Even if no essential good, in a religious way, were to result to the heathen, as it regards the quality of their happiness in a future state, yet there might be much benefit produced in a temporal way, as it respects the amount of happiness in the present world.

We can very easily conceive how the exertion of one individual may affect the welfare of another in temporal things, because men are greatly dependent on each other for happiness in life, though, of course, all men are under the government of the Almighty. And this system of things very plainly intimates the reason and propriety of a future state, to settle all irregularities on earth, and a future judgment to punish those who have injured man as well as disobeyed God. But, we cannot see the same relation between the actions of one man in this world, and the punishment given to another in another world; because the Supreme Being, whom we admire for his goodness, and adore for his perfections, cannot, by all that is taught in the scriptures, so confound things which have a plain and eternal dissimilarity. Let me ask you plainly-Will any man, in your opinion, be rewarded for the deed of another? Do you imagine, that at the judgment-day, any thing extra in your favour will appear, because a man of a different name from yourself, of a different colour perhaps, and in a different part of the world, on some mountain in the East Indies, or some valley in South America,

3 N

spent one day in communion with his Maker, and in such a manner as the Almighty approved? And, on the other hand, if there were a person in some remote part of the earth, who told a lie, or committed any other transgression, would that be alleged against you?

Junius. I must candidly confess, that neither the one nor the other appears to have any thing to do with me; but there surely is a difference between the case of a person who serves the Almighty, and him only, and one who serves God by benefiting his fellow-creatures. For, as all good thoughts are occasioned by Divine influence, either directly or indirectly, so these persons are influenced to wish the welfare of the heathen, and to act accordingly. Hence, the whole may be called a system, by which the Almighty works to save the world.

Philo. This is the opinion to which all must come, though they may have set out with the notion which you, an hour ago, possessed. For then, it was all dependent on man, or nearly so; now it becomes all dependent on God. And this latter supposition will more nearly agree with the idea, that the Almighty is the Governor of the world. But do you not suppose, that man has a power of opposing the influences of grace; and that many instances may exist, in which the Spirit of God has biassed the inclination towards the benefit of the heathen, but the man has turned aside to something else, and neglected it?

Junius. Of course, otherwise the influence must be irresistible, and men, consequently, not liable to reward or punishment on this account.

Philo. If the Supreme Being operates on man, to use him as an instrument in his designs, it is because of the fitness of the work to be performed, and what appears fit and necessary in the mind of the Deity, is never put aside on account of the mere vacillations of man. For if man perform it not, some other instrument will perform it; and if no method accomplish it, within reach of our observation, there must be some method which is beyond the bounds of our comprehension. So, it is not man, or man's exertions, which can procure the favour of the Almighty to his creatures, but the necessary goodness of that Being who is the "Father of all flesh," and "whose

[blocks in formation]

Now, consider a little which of our two systems correspond most nearly with the duty of man and the government of God. You intimated that reward and punishment do not fall on any one exactly according to his conduct. I, on the other hand, imagine they do, and think that this opinion acts as a stimulus to duty better than the other. You supposed, that the Almighty acted by mutable rules, following the changeable track of his creatures; so that, if one individual acted aright, another was benefited, and if one failed in his duty, another was injured, and consigned by the Almighty to everlasting misery. I believe no such thing; but that every man stands on his own ground, and is answerable only for his own sins; and again I ask you, which seems more agreeable to the sublime system of government which the Almighty maintains?

Junius. I perceive the propriety of what you assert, and yet I cannot completely bring my mind up to the same standard. That the justice you speak of, corresponds with what we are taught of God, I cannot deny; and that it seems consistent with the generality of scripture with regard to man, I fully allow; but still there arises some feeling in the mind, perbaps a kind of prejudice, which deters me from embracing unreservedly what you have been advocating.

Philo. What you allude to is rather an impression produced on the mind by a long habit of thinking, and by viewing the subject in a partial manner. It forms a part of the phenomena of the human mind, that opinions early imbibed, and frequently confirmed by the testimony of those around, though they be really very erroneous, yet receive from us a sort of deference approaching to reverence. And according to the importance of its nature, so is the partiality that we feel. This is the origin of bigotry. It is a love of our own opinion, and a jealousy of, and opposition to, every other. From this cause, St. Peter hesitated to acknowledge the Gentiles as being on a level with the Jews. He thought it contrary to the true order of things, and looked on it with abhorrence, yet, what he disliked was really proper. It was from a similar feeling,

that many pious men, at the Reforma- | of conduct, the duty of those who are tion, doubted whether the great altera- properly qualified is to comply, and tion then made, was not rather detri- not talk about the peculiar relation in mental than favourable to the spread which the heathen existed, as it reof religion. But, though this preju- gards the affections of the Almighty dice existed, and though there were towards them. After the gospel was certain feelings of attachment to the introduced, those who believed were Popish church, it does not follow that saved, and those who believed not their scruples were founded on the were condemned. And ministers, and completest propriety. others, have no right to speculate on what would have happened, if they had not exerted themselves, any more than an individual has, to calculate on what would have happened if Adam had not sinned; or, than the philosopher has, to examine what would have existed, if men in general had possessed seven senses instead of five.

Junius. I allow, that prejudice is no evidence of truth; but if errors have crept in among the advocates of missions, how did it happen?

Philo. For this very reason, that all earthly things are changeable. If a system be invented to-day, and lie in no fixed or written form, but depend for patronage on the arguments of public speakers or writers, it will either improve or deteriorate. Suppose, for instance, this system of modern missions took its rise from the Bible, and that the managers of it acted according to the impression which the sacred writings made on their minds, then at the first exertions of a missionary spirit, a very proper notion might have existed. But the persons who advocate it to-day, will use different arguments to what they used yesterday, and next week still more different; and all its supporters acting by the same rule, will form their system on a foundation apparently dissimilar to what it was at first. And the progress of time will mark the change of the system. If only solid stone served as the supporting pillars at first, painted wood or gilded columns must supply the situation in after periods.

Junius. If there be this tendency to change, it would seem fruitless to commence any undertaking.

Philo. By no means; for a liability to change, as I have already observed, may carry a thing towards improvement, as well as the opposite. But, in the missionary undertaking, there seems to have been a greater tendency towards the latter than the former, and therefore I have undertaken to exhibit it. It is only by a prudent management that truth can be discovered or preserved; and much talking very often injures the cause it is intended to promote. As it regards the formation of the missionary system, it would have been well if it had been kept within a proper boundary. If the scripture commands a certain line

Another cause of error arises from the great scale on which missionary undertakings are conducted. Many large institutions exist for the purpose of evangelizing the heathen. The demand for pecuniary assistance is urgent, the expenses generally keeping pace or outrunning the income. In many instances, there is a little sort of emulation among rival societies, though I do not say to a culpable degree-all these things conspire in causing large demands; and the money must be raised by voluntary subscription. This occasions leading men in the various institutions, to use every measure to operate on the feelings of the people, and every thing tending to increase interest is exhibited; so that frequently more is said than the subject will allow. Thus the description of the orator, and the imagery of the poet, are used for biasing the public mind. But the plain truth, distinct from all figurative language, and from all ideas of money: raising, but calmly related as a matter of authentic narrative, would surely come with a very different aspect. In order to accomplish the ends which are kept in view, many men of little thought hazard incorrect assertions; others, of wiser heads, rather encourage them than oppose; thus gradually a system of the most terrific kind is formed, respecting the ignorance of the heathen, the dreadful anger of the benevolent Creator resting on them, the thousands which hourly fall into everlasting burnings, where the first puncture of the spiry flame gives the first idea of a future state, with all other mysteries, miseries, &c. And for what is all this? Or what does it

« FöregåendeFortsätt »