| Scotland. Court of Session - 1822 - 746 sidor
...and that she was lost in the course of that voyage. Kerr and others then applied to the Jury Court for a new trial, on the grounds, 1 . That the verdict was contrary to evidence ; and, 2. That the onus probandi had been irregularly laid upon them, seeing that their defence... | |
| South Carolina. Constitutional Court of Appeals, David James McCord - 1830 - 612 sidor
...the mill in the yeac 1823, than it was in the year 1807, when the defendant purchased. The defendant moved for a new trial, on the grounds, 1. That the verdict was not supported by the evidence. 2. That the defendant had a prescriptive right to raise the waters of... | |
| Thomas Webster - 1844 - 1114 sidor
...jnvenf.jon was no(; the subject-matter of letters patent, and that the specification was insufficient ; and for a new trial, on the grounds — 1. That the verdict was against evidence. 2. Misdirection. 3. The existence of a patent of prior date by about two months,... | |
| Thomas Webster - 1844 - 796 sidor
...invention was not the subject-matter of letters patent, and that the specification was insufficient ; and for a new trial, on the grounds — 1. That the verdict was against evidence. 2. Misdirection. 3. The existence of a patent of prior date by about two months,... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1876 - 738 sidor
...Hastings, Britton & Co. September 27, 1872, and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,385.98. Campbell moved for a new trial on the grounds : 1. That the verdict was contrary to law and evidence. 2. That the court erred in permitting the plaintiffs to introduce incompetent evidence.... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 sidor
...agree on a verdict. At the October term, 1847, the cause was again tried, and verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial, on the grounds : 1. That the verdict was contrary to, and against the evidence. 2. The court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the plaintiffs,... | |
| Georgia. Supreme Court - 1869 - 792 sidor
...the charge,) they retired and found a verdict in flavor of complainants for $10,710 00. Defendants moved for a new trial on the grounds — 1. That the verdict and decree was contrary to law. 2. That the verdict and decree were contrary to the charge of the Court,... | |
| Georgia. Supreme Court - 1861 - 822 sidor
...Jury returned a verdict of guilty, against the defendant, John J. Stewart. Counsel for defendant then moved for a new trial, on the grounds : > 1. That the verdict of the Jury in said case was contrary to Law and the charge of the Court. 2. That the verdict was without... | |
| New York (State). Supreme Court, William Johnson - 1867 - 510 sidor
...the judge. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, which the defendant now moved to set aside, for a new trial, on the grounds, 1 . That the verdict was contrary to evidence ; and, 2. That the judge had rejected proper testimony. * Oakley, for the defendant, contended,... | |
| Georgia. Supreme Court - 1868 - 480 sidor
...limitations are held to have been suspended,) plaintiff is barred." The jury found for defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, on the grounds: 1. That the verdict was against law and evidence. 2. That the above charge was erroneous. At September Term, 1866, this motion... | |
| |