us believes. USSR would intervene to prevent Tragi defeat. 2 obstacles to us- Iran cooperation (Spt for terroris Try'd to Iran (wy help of Ierace) { B Inter provided to Inow Ito sho..- futil in mi ::: Hostages musl be ret'd 1000 TOW? 240 rype of Hawk musile part 1 Results: sisid Iramans accept Treman revolution. ."" mtys conducted acts involved taff - CIA reps (3) (4) For I you no in Lebanon. such activity. Solid contact (thru Ch 2) "y senior member Convinces Iranians of Soviet threat verrorism Ayatolla issued fat-ua" v (6) 100 Tows try'd to Mujadean in 3 factions "in Iran none have. Che over ceptors of hostages. but there no religions influence C Conservative { weir Jacobson no T-72 tank. opposed to war; interested in rebornsup 4745 Ince Veliotti (For min) @ middle of Road (Rapanjani) Proably includes Revolutionary C Radicals (Pri Prime Min musen) Hashimi Support war, terrorism & spread of revolution to remainder of Middle East JMP Wp ns - defensu+. Anti tank + Jacobserv indicates one of group probably Contacts' our action has enhances our status "I military Israelis may be continuing to ship arms to Iren. ("%% our authorization) as they did before our contacts began. CIA involved in all mogs w/ contacts Jacobsen Hostages moved 3 times during his captivity Get copy of JMP Book on Navé Sety Act of 1947 as aminded GPS Attended 2 mog? where basic plen discussed. bases only (..., Amb notified to receive hostages when thought they were coming out) Attended same. 2 mig? Concentrated on Cheney forcible release of hostages Intel Comm House has scheduled hearings for 21 Now 1986 Λ 75-936 0-88-41 Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1986 / Nov. 13 er united and committed to this cause, I think we represent a powerful force for humanity. And when that happens, there'll be no sanctuary on Earth for those who were pilfering human dignity and pandering despait. So, I'm counting on all of you, and I'm looking forward to hearing your views now. Maybe you've heard enough from all of us at this side. Note: The President spoke at 1:35 p.m. in the Cabinet Room at the White House. U.S. Ambassadors to 21 countries attended the 2-day conference, which was held at the White House. Iran-United States Relations Address to the Nation. November 13, 1986 Good evening. I know you've been reading, seeing, and hearing a lot of stories the past several days attributed to Danish sailors, unnamed observers at Italian ports and Spanish harbors, and especially unnamed government officials of my administration. Well, now you're going to hear the facts from a White House source, and you know my name. I wanted this time to talk with you about an extremely sensitive and profoundly important matter of foreign policy. For 18 months now we have had underway a secret diplomatic initiative to Iran. That initiative was undertaken for the simplest and best of reasons: to renew a relationship with the nation of Iran, to bring an honorable end to the bloody 6-year war between Iran and Iraq, to eliminate state-sponsored terrorism and subversion, and to effect the safe return of all hostages. Without Iran's cooperation, we cannot bring an end to the Persian Gulf war; without Iran's concurrence, there can be no enduring peace in the Middle East. For 10 days now, the American and world press have been full of reports and rumors about this initiative and these objectives. Now, my fellow Americans, there's an old saying that nothing spreads so quickly as a rumor. So, I thought it was time to speak with you directly, to tell you firsthand about our dealings with Iran. As Will Rogers once said, "Rumor travels faster, but it don't stay put as long as truth." So, let's get to the facts. The charge has been made that the United States has shipped weapons to Iran as ransom payment for the release of Amer ican hostages in Lebanon, that the United States undercut its allies and secretly violat ed American policy against trafficking with terrorists. Those charges are utterly false. The United States has not made concessions to those who hold our people captive in Lebanon. And we will not. The United States has not swapped boatloads or planeloads of American weapons for the return of American hostages. And we will not Other reports have surfaced alleging U.S. involvement: reports of a sealift to Iran using Danish ships to carry American arms; of vessels in Spanish ports being employed in secret U.S. arms shipments; of Italian ports being used; of the U.S. sending spare parts and weapons for combat aircraft. All these reports are quite exciting, but as far as we're concerned, not one of them is true. During the course of our secret discussions, I authorized the transfer of small amounts of defensive weapons and spare parts for defensive systems to Iran. My purpose was to convince Tehran that our negotiators were acting with my authority, to send a signal that the United States was prepared to replace the animosity between us with a new relationship. These modest deliveries, taken together, could easily fit into a single cargo plane. They could not, taken together, affect the outcome of the 6year war between Iran and Iraq nor could they affect in any way the military balance between the two countries. Those with whom we were in contact took considerable risks and needed a signal of our serious intent if they were to carry on and broaden the dialog. At the same time we undertook this initiative, we made clear that Iran must oppose all forms of international terrorism as a condition of progress in our relationship. The most significant step which Iran could take, we indicated, would be to use its influence in Lebanon to secure the release of all hostages held there. |