 The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved.  Atlantic Reporter - Sida 3741913Obegränsad förhandsgranskning - Om den här boken
 | 1869 - 972 sidor
...Justice Willes delivered the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber in this case, and observed as follows : " The general rule is, that the master is answerable...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases; it has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1867 - 468 sidor
...benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...express command or privity of the master be proved. (3) That principle is acted upon every day in (1) 7 H. & N. 172; 30 LJ (Ex.) 337. (2) Hern v. Nichols,... | |
 | India - 1878 - 710 sidor
...benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 sidor
...237 ; Storey B. Ashton, LR 4 QB 476. § 161. Thus it has been judicially declared in England,1 that "the general rule is, that the master is answerable...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1874 - 880 sidor
...distinction," it has been observed,5 " can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...though no express command or privity of the master can be proved." Ill Fuller v. Wilson, which was an action on the case for a fraudulent misrepresentation... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - 1874 - 238 sidor
...no serviceable distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule, is that the master is answerable...benefit, though no express command or privity of the matter be proved : (Laugher v. Pointer, 5 B. & C. 547, at p. 554.) That principle is acted upon every... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 sidor
...drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is anewerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is...though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher p. Pointer, о Barn. & C. 047, 554. The nature of the action is still... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 sidor
...master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1876 - 762 sidor
...the fraud was committed by the agent in the transaction of the ordinary business of the principal. The general rule is, that the master is answerable...in the' course of the service, and for the master's or principal's benefit, though no express command or privity by the master or principal be proved(c).... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1876 - 996 sidor
...Can. Rail. Co. v. Conybeare, ' 22 Law J- Q- B- 69- <""'<•• See Wilson v. Kankin, LR, I 438 eral rule is, that the master is answerable for every such...in the course of the service, and for the master's or principal's benefit, though no express command or privity by the master or principal be proved,... | |
| |
