Holocaust Denial: Demographics, Testimonies, and IdeologiesUniversity Press of America, 2000 - 406 sidor Zimmerman's work is the only book that comprehensively examines the underlying arguments of Holocaust denial. He goes into great depth on the actual arguments that deniers use. Holocaust Denial examines their methodology, use of sources and reasoning process. Historians have been very reluctant to examine denier arguments because they do not want to draw attention to them. But this movement is gaining ground in Europe and Canada, and will only become stronger as the World War II generation passes away. This book will debunk all of the denier arguments. Zimmerman will finally provide the reader who is interested in the actual arguments of denial a means to evaluate their legitimacy. The true value of this book will be realized when the last of that generation is gone. This book is of value to historians and Holocaust scholars, as well as anyone interested in the Holocaust and the denial movement. |
Från bokens innehåll
Resultat 1-3 av 77
Sida 71
... testimony ? One method , as already noted , is to examine the common characteristics of eyewitness testimony . Do the accounts tend to corroborate one another as to central events even if certain details differ ? Particularly important ...
... testimony ? One method , as already noted , is to examine the common characteristics of eyewitness testimony . Do the accounts tend to corroborate one another as to central events even if certain details differ ? Particularly important ...
Sida 109
... testimony against the defendants , they simply tried to shift the blame onto someone else . The Belsen Trial occurred in late 1945 , a time when Butz had claimed that ... testimony of former inmates it was Perpetrator Testimony 109.
... testimony against the defendants , they simply tried to shift the blame onto someone else . The Belsen Trial occurred in late 1945 , a time when Butz had claimed that ... testimony of former inmates it was Perpetrator Testimony 109.
Sida 110
... testimony . Staglich had a great deal of trouble with the testimony of Hans Stark because he admitted to pouring gas into the chamber . Staglich accused Stark of lying because he never said anything about a gas mask which was needed ...
... testimony . Staglich had a great deal of trouble with the testimony of Hans Stark because he admitted to pouring gas into the chamber . Staglich accused Stark of lying because he never said anything about a gas mask which was needed ...
Andra upplagor - Visa alla
Holocaust Denial: Demographics, Testimonies, and Ideologies John C. Zimmerman Fragmentarisk förhandsgranskning - 2000 |
Holocaust Denial: Demographics, Testimonies, and Ideologies John C. Zimmerman Ingen förhandsgranskning - 2000 |
Vanliga ord och fraser
appears Arad Archives argued arrived Arthur Butz Auschwitz Auschwitz Chronicle barracks Bauleitung Belzec Birkenau bodies building camp authorities Carlo Mattogno Chapter cited claimed coke concentration camps Corpse Cellar cremation crematoria cyanide Czech David Irving Death Books Death Camp delousing delousing chamber discussed document double muffle Eichmann Einsatzgruppen evidence extermination eyewitness facilities fact Faurisson Final Solution gas chambers gassing cellar German Germany's Goebbels Gusen Himmler historians Hitler Hoess Holocaust denier Hungarian Jews Hungarian operation Ibid incinerated Irving's issue Jean-Claude Pressac Jewish July June killed known Krema Kremer Leuchter Report March mass murder Mattogno memo memoirs mentioned million morgue Nazi noted Nyiszli October Operation Reinhard ovens photographs pits Poland Polish Pressac problem Rassinier registered prisoners registration numbers Reich resettlement samples Sanning Sobibor Sonderkommando Soviet Union special action special treatment Staglich testimony Text Topf transport Treblinka trial typhus Weber White Bunker wrote Yitzhak Arad Zyklon