 ... where the misdescription, although not proceeding from fraud, is in a material and substantial point, so far affecting the subjectmatter of the contract, that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never...  The Weekly Notes - Sida 63redigerad av - 1902Obegränsad förhandsgranskning - Om den här boken
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1903 - 930 sidor
...subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...not bound to resort to the clause of compensation.' This is a negative proposition, but a pregnant one. If the error is of such consequence that it may... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1835 - 816 sidor
...subject matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...the thing which was really the subject of the sale; as in Jones \.Edney, where the subject matter of the sale was described to be a " free public house,"... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1835 - 818 sidor
...subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...the thing which was really the subject of the sale; as in Jones v. Edney, where the subject-matter of the sale was described to be "afree public house,"... | |
 | Samuel Vallis Bone - 1839 - 398 sidor
...subject matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...the thing which was really the subject of the sale ; as in Jones v. Edney, where the subjectmatter of the sale was described to be a " free public house,"... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1839 - 956 sidor
...subject-mattef of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...facts, the purchaser may be considered as not having 1838. purchased the thing which was really the subject of the sale." The circumstance of the plaintiffnot... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1839 - 1084 sidor
...subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, tub for such misdescriptinn, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...altogether, and the purchaser is not bound to resort to theclause of compensation. Under such a state of tacts, the purchaser may be considered as not having... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger - 1846 - 1126 sidor
...subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...not bound to resort to the clause of compensation." Here, the plaintiff bought upon an understanding that for nine years, he had an improved rent of 39/.... | |
 | Charles Davidson - 1844 - 740 sidor
...subject-matter of the contract, that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...the thing which was really the subject of the sale." Vendor's claim The condition is always so worded, as to allow the vendor to obtain in compensa- compensation,... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1844 - 910 sidor
...subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that but for such misdescription the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...purchased the thing which was really the subject of sale, as in Janes v. Edney, 3 Camp. 285., where the subject-matter was described to be a free public-house,... | |
 | 1845 - 532 sidor
...subject matter of the contract, that it may reasonably be supposed that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...purchased the thing which was really the subject of sale." (3.) Where a misdescription is not, from the nature of it, capable of pecuniary estimation,... | |
| |
