Om den här boken
Mitt bibliotek
Böcker på Google Play
LECTURE V.
PACE
Statement of the proof of the Real Presence from the words
of Institution, Matt. xxvi. 26-29; Mark xiv. 22-25; Luke
xxii. 19, 20; 1 Cor. xi. 23-26-Strong dogmatical ground
of this Argument from the Decision of the Council of
Trent-Onus probandi thrown upon Protestants, who are
obliged to demonstrate two things: 1. That these words
may be taken figuratively; 2. That we are obliged so to
take them-Examination of the first point
LECTURE VI.
Examination of the second point at issue between Catholics
and Protestants, on the Words of Institution; are we
compelled to prefer the figurative interpretation in order to
escape from greater difficulties, such as contradictions
and violations of the law of nature.-Hermeneutical disqui-
sition on the subject.-Philosophical principles applied to
it. Strong confirmatory Arguments of the Catholic Inter-
pretation, from the construction of the words, and from the
circumstances of the institution
LECTURE VII.
Objections to the literal interpretation of the Words of Insti-
tution answered.-First: Ordinary practice of calling a
representation by the name of the thing signified.—
Secondly: Objections drawn from the Celebration of the
Paschal Feast; and Thirdly: From the language in which
our Saviour spoke.-Notice of Dr. Lee's Allegations
LECTURE VIII.
Arguments for the Real Presence, from the doctrine of St.
Paul regarding the use of the blessed Sacrament.-Gene-
ral objections against the Catholic doctrine from Scripture.
-Remark on the Connexion between the Real Presence
and Transubstantiation
161
201
229
263
SUBSCRIBERS' NAMES.
Most Rev. Samuel Eccleston, D. D. Arch-Bishop of Baltimore,
6 Copies.
6
Right Rev. Francis P. Kenrick, D. D. Right Rev. John Hughes,D. D. New York, 6 Very Rev. Edward Barron, D. D.
66
Rev. James Miller,
Rev. Edward Sourin,
Rev. P. Maher, Harrisburg,