 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 988 sidor
...than that demanded by the salvors. In Short v. Kalloway (b), Lord Denman, CJ, says — " No person has a right to inflame his own account against another,...incurring additional expense in the unrighteous resistance of an action which he cannot defend." Walker v. Halton (c) was a much stronger case than this : there... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1841 - 692 sidor
..." No person has a right to inflame his own account against another, by incur- Exch. of Pleat, ring additional expense in the unrighteous resistance to an ^ "^** „ action which he cannot defend." It must be remembered PENLEY that this is not the case of a contract to indemnify at all WATTS. events.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1843 - 852 sidor
...to prove that he was a bond fide holder. In Short v. Kalloway(a), Lord Denman says, — " No person has a right to inflame his own account against another...unrighteous resistance to an action which he cannot defend." So also, a party cannot inflame his demand against another, by a neglect to defend an action to which... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1844 - 988 sidor
...sum than that demanded by the salvors. In Short v. Kalloway (b), Lord Denman, CJ, says—" No person has a right to inflame his own account against another,...incurring additional expense in the unrighteous resistance of an action which he cannot defend." Walker v. Nation (c) was a much stronger case than this: there... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger - 1845 - 880 sidor
...breach of contract by the defendant. In Short v. Kallcmoay (a), it is said by Lord Dmman, " No person has a right to inflame his own account against another,...unrighteous resistance to an action which he cannot defend. The circumstance relied on, that the damages were unliquidated, makes no difference." [Tindal CJ You... | |
 | Thomas Platt - 1847 - 928 sidor
...120/. were the necessary consequence of the defendant's breach of contract ; and that no person had a right to inflame his own account against another...in the unrighteous resistance to an action which he could not defend (z). If a lessor re-enter in consequence of an underlessee's (x) Woods v. Pope, 6... | |
 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1852 - 722 sidor
...itself, or which he might not have chosen to incur. "No person," says Lord Chief Justice Denman,* " has a right to inflame his own account against another,...assignment to the plaintiff had covenanted that all the covenants had been performed. The covenants had not been performed ; the lease had become voidable... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court, Hamilton Chamberlain Jones - 1855 - 512 sidor
...Scd'k. 325, and cases cited. \nShort v. Kalloway, llth Ad. and Ellis 28, Lord DENMAN says, "no person has a right to inflame his own account against another,...unrighteous resistance to an action which he cannot defend." This is not an accommodation note. The judgment below is reversed, and judgment on the case agreed,... | |
 | Conway Robinson - 1855 - 884 sidor
...Compton fyc. 3 Barn. <fc Adol. 407, 23 Eng. Com. Law Rep. 106. But as a general rule, a person should not inflame his own account against another by incurring...unrighteous resistance to an action which he cannot defend. Short v. Kalloway, 11 Adol. &, El. 28, 39 Eng. Com. Law Rep. 17. 5. Insurance of buildings against... | |
 | John William Smith, John Innes Clark Hare, Horace Binney Wallace, John William Wallace - 1855 - 1006 sidor
...Smith v. Compton, 3 B. & Ad. 407. [Short v. Kalloway, 11 A. & E. 28, ubi per Lord Denman, " No person has a right to inflame his own account against another,...expense in the unrighteous resistance to an action he cannot defend." See Walker v. Hatton, 10 M. & W. 249 ; and see Tindall v. Bell, 11 M. A: W. 228.J... | |
| |
No person has a right to inflame his own account against another, by incurring additional expense in the unrighteous resistance to an action which he cannot defend. 
