Stanford University Publications: University series. Language and literatureStanford University Press, 1936 |
Från bokens innehåll
Resultat 1-3 av 80
Sida 23
... appears unchanged in the quarto , where with obvious inconsistency it must refer to Catesby alone . The error would hardly be noticeable in the rapid utterance of the stage , and so , doubtless , escaped correction . Catesby was an ...
... appears unchanged in the quarto , where with obvious inconsistency it must refer to Catesby alone . The error would hardly be noticeable in the rapid utterance of the stage , and so , doubtless , escaped correction . Catesby was an ...
Sida 24
... appears in only one scene . It was therefore easy to substitute Rivers , whose presence was not required . But where the part could be omitted without injury to the play , as in the case of " walking characters " who appear upon the ...
... appears in only one scene . It was therefore easy to substitute Rivers , whose presence was not required . But where the part could be omitted without injury to the play , as in the case of " walking characters " who appear upon the ...
Sida 65
... appears below combined with the Folio line as a greeting to Stanley . That is , the quarto's " How now , what newes with you ? " is plainly a composite of the two original lines , " How now , what newes ? " and " Stanley , what newes ...
... appears below combined with the Folio line as a greeting to Stanley . That is , the quarto's " How now , what newes with you ? " is plainly a composite of the two original lines , " How now , what newes ? " and " Stanley , what newes ...
Innehåll
CHAPTER PAGE I An Introduction to the Problem | 7 |
The Quarto an Acting Version | 19 |
The Quarto an Actors Version | 29 |
Upphovsrätt | |
6 andra avsnitt visas inte
Vanliga ord och fraser
accent actor addition Anapestic appears Bacchiac beginning Book chapter Christ cited clash clause closely common complete concerned considerations considered construction course cretic discussion doubt effect element English error evidence examples explanation expression fact feeling final Folio foot frequently Germanic give grace Greek hand iambic words ictus idea important indicates instances interpretation koinon language Latin less Lord meaning metrical Middle mind nature object occur omission omitted original Otfrid passage perhaps phrase Plautus play position possible preceding present printer probably Puritan Quarto quarto text question quid reader reason reference regard result Richard seems senarii similar speech Spenser stands suggests syllable taken term thaz theory third thou thought tion Trinummus trochaic UNIVERSITY variation verb verse Vulgate