Sidor som bilder
PDF
ePub

SENATE.

Reprisals on British Commerce

JUNE, 1812.

for recommitting the bill to the committee ap-same, in such manner that the President shall pointed on the confidential Message of the President of the United States, of the 1st of June, as follows:

have the power to authorize the public armed ships and vessels of the United States to make reprisals upon the public and private ships and vesResolved, That the bill, entitled "An act declaring sels, goods, and merchandise, belonging to the war between Great Britain and her dependencies, and Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain the United States and their Territories," be recommit- and Ireland, and to the subjects thereof; and also to ted to the committee to whom was committed the Mes-grant letters of marque and reprisal, under suitable sage of the President, of the 1st instant, with instruc- regulations, to be provided in the bill, to private tions to modify and amend the same, in such manner ships and vessels to make reprisals, agreeably to that the President of the United States shall have power said instructions, reported as follows: to authorize the public armed ships and vessels of the United States to make reprisals upon the public and private ships and vessels, goods, and merchandise, being amendment: longing to the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or to the subjects thereof; and also to grant letters of marque and reprisal, under suitable regulations, to be provided in the bill, to private armed ships and vessels to make like reprisals.

THURSDAY, June 11.

"After the word that, in the third line of the bill, strike out the residue of the bill, and insert the follow

"The President of the United States shall be and he is hereby authorized, from and after the -day of

next ensuing, to cause reprisals to be made upon the public and private ships and vessels, goods, and merchandise, belonging to the Crown of the United On motion by Mr. SMITH, of Maryland, that Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or to the subthe motion be amended, so as that the bill be re-jects thereof, which may be found on the high seas, or committed to a new committee, it was determined elsewhere, after the said day of next, exceptin the negative. And after debate, the President ing such ships, vessels, or property, as now are, or may, before the said resumed the Chair, and the Senate adjourned. day of next, be within the ports and harbors, or under the control, of the United States, and all ships, vessels, or property, within the jurisdiction of any Power with whom the United States are not engaged in war; and, for the purposes aforesaid, to instruct the commanders of the public armed vessels which are or which shall be employed in the service of the United States, to subdue, seize, and take, any arined or other British vessel belonging to the said United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or to the subjects thereof, which shall be found within the jurisdictional limits of the United States, or elsewhere, on the high seas as aforesaid. And such captured vessel, with her apparel, guns, and appurtenances, and the goods or effects which shall be found on board the same, being British property, shall be brought within some port of the United States, and shall be duly proceeded against and condemned as forfeited, and shall accrue and be distributed as by law is or shall be provided, respecting the captures which shall be made by the public armed vessels of the United States.

Mr. GAILLARD was requested to take the Chair. On motion by Mr. ANDERSON, the bill from the House of Representatives, entitled "An act de claring war between Great Britain and her dependencies, and the United States and their Territories," was resumed, and considered as in Committee of the Whole, together with the motion yesterday submitted by Mr. GREGG; and, on the question to agree to the motion, it was determined in the affirmative-yeas 17, nays 13, as follows: YEAS-Messrs. Bayard, Condit, Dana, German, Giles, Gilman, Goodrich, Gregg, Horsey, Howell, Hunter, Lambert, Leib, Lloyd, Reed, Smith of New York, and Worthington.

NAYS-Messrs. Anderson, Bibb, Campbell of Tennessee, Crawford, Cutts, Franklin, Gaillard, Pope, Smith of Maryland, Tait, Taylor, Turner, and Varnum. Whereupon, Mr. CRAWFORD resumed the Chair; and, on motion by Mr. ANDERSON, it was ordered that the committee to whom this bill is mitted have leave to sit immediately.

FRIDAY, June 12.

Mr. LLOYD submitted the following motion for consideration:

"That the President of the United States be requested

"SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States shall be, and he is hereby, authorized to grant, to the owners of private armed recom-ships and vessels of the United States, who shall make application therefor, commissions in the form which he shall direct, under the seal of the United States; and such private armed vessels, when duly commissioned as aforesaid, shall have the same license and authority for subduing, seizing, and capturing any armed or other British vessels belonging to the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or to the subjects thereof, and for the recapturing of the vessels, goods, and effects, of the people of the United States, law have, and shall be in like manner subject to as the public armed vessels of the United States by such instructions as shall be ordered by the President of the United States, in conformity with the established law of nations, and the treaties and laws of the United States, for the regulation of their conduct; and the commissions which shall be granted as aforesaid shall be revocable at the pleasure of the President of the United States

to cause to be laid before the Senate, confidentially, or otherwise, as he may deem expedient, all the information in the Department of State, not heretofore communicated, having relation to the conduct of Great Britain and France towards the United States."

Ordered, That it lie for consideration.

REPRISALS ON BRITISH COMMERCE.

Mr. ANDERSON, from the committee to whom was recommitted the bill, entitled "An act declaring war between Great Britain and her depen"SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, That every perdencies, and the United States and their Territo-son intending to set forth and employ an armed vessel, ries," with instructions to modify and amend the and applying for the commission as aforesaid, shall pro

JUNE, 1812.

Reprisals on British Commerce.

duce, in writing, the name, and suitable description of the tonnage and force, of the vessel, and the name of residence of each owner concerned therein, the number of the crew, and the name of the commander and the two officers next in rank appointed for such vessel; which writing shall be signed by the person or persons making such application, and filed with the Secretary of State, or shall be delivered to any other officer or person who shall be employed to deliver out such commissions, to be by him transmitted to the Secretary of State.

"SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That, before any commission as aforesaid shall be issued, the owner or owners of the ship or vessel for which the same shall be requested, and the commander thereof for the time being, shall give bond to the United States, with at least two responsible sureties, not interested in such vessel, in the penal sum of - thousand dollars; or, if such vessel be provided with more than one hundred and fifty men, then in the penal sum of - thousand dollars, with condition that the owners, and officers, and crew, who shall be employed on board of such commissioned vessels, shall and will observe the treaties and laws of the United States, and the instructions which shall be given them as aforesaid for the regulation of their conduct, and will satisfy all damages and injuries which shall be done or committed contrary to the tenor thereof by such vessel, during her commis sion, and to deliver up the same when revoked by the President of the United States.

"SEC. 5. And be it further enacted, That all public and private ships and vessels, goods, and merchandise, belonging to the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or to the subjects thereof, together with their apparel, guns, and appurtenances, which shall be found on board the same, being British property, and which shall be captured by any private armed vessel or vessels of the United States, duly commissioned as aforesaid, shall be forfeited, and shall acby whom such capture shall be made, and, on due condemnation had, shall be distributed according to any agreement which shall be between them, or, in failure of such agreement, then by the discretion of the court

crue to the owners thereof and the officers and crews

before whom such condemnation shall be.

"SEC. 6. And be it further enacted, That all vessels, goods, and effects, the property of any citizen of the United States, or person resident therein, which shall be recaptured as aforesaid, shall be restored to the lawful owners upon payment by them respectively of a just and reasonable salvage, to be determined by the mutual agreement of the parties concerned, or by the decree of any court of the United States having maritime jurisdiction, according to the nature of each case; provided, that such allowance shall not be less than one-eighth, or exceeding one-half, of the full value of such recapture, without any deduction; and such salvage shall be distributed to and among the owners, officers, and crews, of the private armed vessel or vessels entitled thereto, according to any agreement which shall be between them, or, in case of no agreement, then by the decree of the court who shall determine upon such salvage.

"SEC. 7. And be it further enacted, That, before breaking bulk of any vessel which shall be captured as aforesaid, or other disposal or conversion thereof, or of any articles which shall be found on board the same, such capture shall be brought into some port of the United States, and shall be libelled and proceeded

SENATE.

against before the district court of the same district; and, after a due course of proceeding, such capture shall be decreed as forfeited in the district court, or in the circuit court of the same district in the case of any appeal duly allowed, the same shall be delivered to the owners and captors concerned therein, or shall be publicly sold by the marshal of the same court, as shall be finally decreed and ordered by the court. And the same court, who shall have final jurisdiction of any libel or complaint of any capture as aforesaid, shall and may decree restitution in whole or part, when the capture and restraint shall have been made without just cause as aforeasaid; and if made without probable cause, or otherwise unreasonably, may order and decree damages and costs to the party injured, and for which the owners, officers, and crews, of the private armed vessel or vessels by which such unjust capture shall have been made, and, also, such vessel or vessels shall be answerable and liable.

"SEC. 8. And be it further enacted, That all British subjects and others, who shall be found acting on board of any British vessel which shall be captured, or on board of any vessel of the United States which shall be recaptured as aforesaid, shall be reported to the collector of the port in which they shall first arrive, and shall be delivered to the custody of the marshal or some civil or military officer of the United States, or of any State, in or near such port, who shall receive and take into custody the said subjects or persons for their safe-keeping and support, at the expense of the United States."

Amend the title, after the word "act," strike out the rest of the title, and insert" authorizing reprisals against the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the subjects thereof."

And the report was read. Whereupon, Mr. GAILLARD was requested to take the Chair; and the bill and amendments were considered as in Committee of the Whole; and, on motion, by Mr. POPE. to amend the report, by inserting, after the word thereof," in the tenth line of the first section, the words "and, also, upon the publie and private ships and vessels, goods, and merchandise, belonging to the Crown of France or to the subjects thereof:" it was determined in the negative-yeas 15, nays 17, as follows:

YEAS-Messrs. Bayard, Condit, Dana, German, Giles, Gilman, Goodrich, Horsey, Hunter, Lambert, Lloyd, Pope, Reed, Smith of Maryland, and Worthington.

NAYS-Messrs. Anderson, Bibb, Brent, Campbell of Tennessee, Crawford, Cutts, Franklin, Gaillard, Gregg, Howell, Leib, Robinson, Smith of New York, Tait, Taylor, Turner, and Varnum.

On the question to strike out, as reported by the committee, for the purpose of inserting the amendments, the yeas were 16, and the nays 16.

On motion, by Mr. LEIB, the yeas and nays having been required by one-fifth of the Senators present, those who voted in the affirmative, are:

Messrs. Bayard, Condit, Dana, German, Gilman, Leib, Lloyd, Reed, Smith of New York, and WorthGoodrich, Gregg, Horsey, Howell, Hunter, Lambert,

ington.

Those who voted in the negative, are:

Messrs. Anderson, Bibb, Brent, Campbell of Tennessee, Crawford, Cutts, Franklin, Gaillard, Giles,

SENATE.

Hostilities with Great Britain.

Pope, Robinson, Smith of Maryland, Tait, Taylor, Turner, and Varnum.

So the Senate being equally divided, the question was lost, and the original bill was resumed.

On motion, to agree to the first report of the select committee, and strike out of the original bill, line 9, the words "and all persons inhabiting within its territories or possessions:" it was determined in the affirmative-yeas 21, nays 11, as follows:

YEAS-Messrs. Anderson, Bayard, Condit, Dana, German, Giles, Gilman, Goodrich, Gregg, Horsey, Howell, Hunter, Lambert, Leib, Lloyd, Pope, Reed, Smith, of Maryland, Smith, of New York, Varnum, and Worthington.

NAYS-Messrs. Bibb, Brent, Campbell, of Tennessee, Crawford, Cutts, Franklin, Gaillard, Robinson, Tait, Taylor, and Turner.

On motion, it was also agreed to insert the word "and," in the ninth line, after the word "Britain."

SATURDAY, June 13.

The Senate resumed the consideration of the motion submitted yesterday by Mr. LLOYD; and, on the question to agree thereto, it was determined in the negative-yeas 14, nays 17, as follows:

YEAS-Messrs. Bayard, Dana, German, Giles, Gilman, Goodrich, Gregg, Horsey, Hunter, Lambert, Leib, Lloyd, Reed, and Smith, of Maryland.

NAYS-Messrs. Anderson, Bibb, Brent, Campbell, of Tennessee, Condit, Crawford, Cutts, Franklin, Gaillard, Howell, Robinson, Smith, of New York, Tait, Taylor, Turner, Varnum, and Worthington.

DECLARATION OF WAR.

Mr. GAILLARD was requested to take the Chair; and, on motion, by Mr. ANDERSON, the consideration of the bill, entitled "An act declaring war between Great Britain and her dependencies, and the United States and their Territories," was resumed, as in Committee of the Whole; and haying agreed to sundry amendments, the President resumed the Chair; and Mr. GAILLARD reported the bill with amendments, which were considered in Senate aud agreed to as follows:

Third line, after the word "between," strike out to the end of the line, and insert, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the dependencies thereof."

Line 4, after the word "States," where it first occurs, insert, "of America."

Line 9, after the word "Britain," strike out to the end of the bill, and insert, "the said United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the subjects thereof."

A motion was made by Mr. GERMAN, to post pone the further consideration of the bill to the first Monday in November next.

Mr. GERMAN addressed the Chair as follows: Mr. President: I made the motion to postpone the consideration of the bill now before us, from a conviction that it will be extremely injurious to the country to pass it at this time. I feel, sir, that the State I have the honor to represent has a pe

JUNE, 1812.

culiar interest in the event of this question; and I also feel the weight of the interest which the nation at large has at stake, in the event of the passage of this bill. I therefore consider it a duty I owe my constituents, to use every reasonable exertion in my power to prevent the object of that bill, until the country is better prepared to carry it into effect.

As I presume the war, if declared, is intended to be an offensive one, I will, to establish the propriety of my motion, take a general view of the situation of this country; of its means to carry on offensive operations, as well as to defend itself, and of the situation and relative strength also of the country we are required to make war upon.

I am ready to allow, Mr. President, that both Great Britain and France have given us abundant cause for war; on this occasion, therefore, I shall dispense with using any argument which might serve to show, that if we were even in a state of preparation, and possessed the means of insuring a favorable issue, it would be bad policy for this country, at the present time, to enter into war with Great Britain, although perhaps many weighty reasons might be adduced in support of such argument.

I will first call the attention of the Senate to the ability and strength of the nation we are tlemen ought to recollect, that Great Britain has about, by this bill, to declare war against. Genbeen almost constantly engaged in war for twenty years past against one of the most powerful nations that ever existed; and for a considerable part of that time, the energies of her enemy have been directed by war's favorite genius-NAPOLEON, who has succeeded in uniting nearly the whole force of the Continent of Europe against her: against that very nation which we are about to assail; and what has been the effect? Is Great Britain less powerful now, than she was twenty years ago? No, sir, this constant warfare has increased her powers instead of diminishing them. At the commencement of the war, France was nearly her equal on the ocean, and several other nations of Europe maintained a powerful naval force. But what is their situation at present ? Has not Great Britain driven them all from the ocean? And does she not remain sole mistress? I ask, gentlemen, if her ability to carry on a distant war by land or sea, has diminished? The answer must be that it has increased with her navy, and extended with her dominion. Great Britain now commands the strength and resources of most of the West India islands, and many of the islands in the Indian Ocean. She controls the destinies of more than thirty millions of people ou the Continent of Asia. And she has, at this time, or will have, if we engage in a war with her, the exclusive benefit of the trade of the world; and under these circumstances possesses the ability to carry on a war in distant countries across the ocean, beyond any nation ever heard of.

These considerations, Mr. President, lead me to the view of our situation and means of defence, and of our ability to carry immediate war into the colonies of Upper and Lower Canada. I will first

JUNE, 1812.

Hostilities with Great Britain.

SENATE.

their situation? Sixteen hundred of the militia of the State of New York have been ordered into public service, on the frontiers of that State, and have, as I am informed, marched to their place of destination. There we find exhibiting a spectacle that would wound the feelings of the most callous man-without hats, without blankets to cover them, without camp kettles to cook the miserable provisions furnished them by the Government contractors, or any one necessary for camp equipage. Their officers with the utmost difficul ty preventing their marching home for self preservation. Here, Mr. President, I wish to call the attention of the Senate to the propriety and constitutionality of calling out this detachment of militia at a time when no enemy menaced an invasion. The Constitution only authorizes the General Government to call out the militia to suppress insurrection, enforce the laws, and repel. invasion. And I would ask whether either of these events had happened when this corps of militia were ordered out? No. It it well known that no such emergency existed. But they have this miserable consolation, that they are to receive six dollars and two-thirds a month, for their services, finding their own clothes, arms and accoutrements. I do not mention these things with a wish to discourage the militia from serving their country when necessary, nor do I believe defending them in their constitutional rights will have that effect, for I am fully aware that there is no class of citizens more patriotic or willing to defend their country than they are, and will be so found when the safety of it shall really demand their services.

consider the situation of our maritime frontier, beginning at New Orleans, and examine the situation of that place. We learn from the War Office that there is little rising of one hundred regular troops stationed near the city for its defence. Now I will ask any gentleman if that paltry force is sufficient for that object; and if it will not be in the power of the British to take possession of that city within sixty days after your declaration of war against them? If gentlemen calculate on the goodness and forbearance of the enemy, I think they will be deceived. Great Britain is a wily, active nation. She has been trained to war. She will not measure her steps and movements by ours; if we are not prepared to defend our seaports, she will not wait until we are; and should she get possession of New Orleans, it will cost much blood and treasure to dislodge her. Passing northerly along our coast, let us see what is the situa tion of our most valuable cities. Charleston and Norfolk, as well as many other places of less consequence, are found exposed to marine attacks. And when we reach the city of New York (the nation's great emporium of trade) do we, on viewing its situation, and strength of the public works for its defence, find it in a perfect state of security? No, sir, unless the greatest part of your frig ates are stationed there, to aid your fortifications and gunboats, it will fall a prey to the enemy. It can be assailed by a small fleet, with every prospect of success. The only resistance they would meet with would be in passing the fortifications on Staten Island, and perhaps a few shots from Bedlow's and Ellis's Islands. They might soon place themselves abreast the works at the upper end of the city, the weakest of them all. And I I will now resume the consideration of our sithave no doubt two seventy fours might silence uation up the Lakes to Detroit and Fort Malden. this work in twenty or thirty minutes. They Here it mast be remembered that the British comwould then meet with no other resistance than mand the Lakes. We are told that Governor Hull from travelling guns on the shore and from the is marching to the defence of Detroit with twelve docks. The result would probably be, that the hundred militia from the State of Ohio, together city would be set on fire, or a contribution extort-with four hundred regular troops, formed and dised from its inhabitants. I will now pass on to Rhode Island. Does the prospect of security there fatter us? No, sir. I am told by competent judges that nothing short of a force of from three to five thousand men can defend that island. Boston, it is said, can be defended, and is, perhaps, the only secure place of considerable consequence on the seaboard. In viewing the situation along the province of Maine, and our northern frontier up the river St. Lawrence, and the Lakes to Fort Malden, and from thence to the Mississippi, do we not find almost every point and place where there are inhabitants, subject to the incursions of the enemy? Have they not more troops on and near the line than we have? Yes, sir, they have ten to our one, and a militia which the Government of Canada have been fully vigilant in training. I understand that ever since the prospect of war began to thicken in the political horizon, they have trained their militia three or four times a month, and have paid them daily wages for their services. Not so, sir, with our militia-they have, it is true, been called into the public service to do the duty of regular troops; and what is now

ciplined for action by the brave Colonel Boyd. These troops, I hope, will be better supplied and provided for than those on the frontier of New York. It is whispered by some of the favorites who are suffered to know the projects of our Government, that the British have sent a part of their regular troops, together with a number of Indians, from Fort Malden to Fort Erie, near the Falls of Niagara; and this is taken as certain evidence of the weakness of the garrison at Fort Malden, and that that fort may consequently be surprised and taken by Governor Hull with little difficulty. Now I draw the exact contrary conclusion from this circumstance; for the British must have known that Governor Hull was on his march to Detroit, and if they had been weak at Fort Malden they never would have detached part of their force and sent it to the aid of Fort Erie. But presuming they had not heard of Governor Hull's march, and that they had left that fort comparatively defenceless, they will assuredly learn it soon enough to have the detachment return by water before Governor Hull can reach Malden. And if in the attempt to take Fort Malden, Governor

SENATE.

Hostilities with Great Britain.

Hull should meet with a defeat, the consequences will be alarming; for no reinforcement can be sent him, nor any assistance afforded soon enough to prevent a disastrous termination of the expedition. In that case the British, with a partial aid from the Indians, might cross the river and take possession of Detroit; and if they should then obtain the assistance of the Indians generally, it will be in their power to drive in all the frontier settlements of Ohio; and there can be little doubt when this war is once commenced that nearly all the Indians will flock to the British standard. I will here take the liberty of adverting to complaints of our Government, in the diplomatic correspondence with Mr. Foster; and must acknowledge, after so much talk about British perfidy, with regard to exciting the Indians to make war upon us, I am disappointed when I refer to the proof offered by the Executive on that subject. I did expect that after it was made a particular part of an Executive message, the proof offered in its support would have been clear and conclusive. Far be it from me that I should wish to become the apologist for any of the aggressions of the British upon our rights, or any of their unfriendly conduct towards us, but I think, if our Executive instead of carping and scolding about the vigilance of the British, in inducing the Indians to join them, in the event of a war between the two countries, had been more vigilant in furnishing the Indians with the necessaries they had been in the habit of receiving from our public trading houses and other sources, and had seasonably recommended to Congress to have authorized the Executive to make the Indians some suitable presents, at proper times, it would have been productive of more good to our western frontier. It is said that the British furnish the Indians with arms and ammunition; well, do not our public stores and traders do the same? And do not the Indians depend upon their arms and ammunition for their daily subsistence? It should be recollected that they are a people who live by hunting, and they must be supplied with arms and ammunition from some quarter or other. While I am on this subject, Mr President, I will beg leave just to notice the Indian war between the troops under the command of Governor Harrison, and the Prophet and his adherents-I mean the famous battle of Tippecanoe; and I will ask, sir, for what purpose was Governor Harrison and the army under his command sent against those people?

JUNE, 1812.

nacing attitude before the Indian town, on their own lands, and in their own territory? And had not the Prophet and his party sufficient reason to believe that everything dear to them was at stake? Yes, sir, their homes, their firesides, and their all, was about to be destroyed, except they submitted unconditionally to the commander who had, perhaps, been the cause of all the difficulty which subsisted between the Indians and our Government. And I must here ask, Mr. President, if any one can blame the Indians for fighting, under such circumstances? No, sir. I conceive if they had not fought they would have debased human nature itself. Since, then, this flame is kindled, and that, too, by ourselves, is it prudent to wage a premature war with Great Britain, and bring her force in reality and openly in aid of the savage tomahawk and scalping-knife, already raised against our innocent frontier settlements? I think the more prudent course would be first to treat with the Indians, to send some two or three discreet and proper men among them to promise them justice and friendship, and really to perform what is just and right towards them; and, then, my word for it, they would be willing to remain at peace with us. In the mean time let us raise and discipline our army and fortify our seaports and harbors. And when we are prepared, if Great Britain does not, in the mean time, do us justice, we can then attack her colonies with more certain prospects of success; and, with the satisfaction, too, of having first detached from her the aid of a savage enemy, whose known rule of warfare is to spare neither age nor sex.

I will next, Mr. President, take a view of our real effective disposable force, which, in the event of immediate war, is to protect and defend the vast extent of our Northern and Western frontier, which will be exposed to the incursions of the enemy, especially if we have war with the British and Western Indians, both at the same time. If we may consider the statement obtained from the head of the War Department, as correct, what a discouraging appearance does it afford us! The records in the War Office tell us that, including officers, there are between six and seven thousand men in the two old armies ; but as to the new army of 25,000 men, it is difficult to give any certain account of the number recruited. It is, however, said, that orders have been issued directing the recruiting officers to make monthly returns; but, from information which cannot be If there was any disagreement between the In- doubted, it seems that these orders have not been dians and our Government, why were not discreet observed; so that the War Department are quite commissioners sent to treat with them first, and in the dark as to the number actually enlisted in let them know that the Government was willing the new army. I understand, however, that an to do them justice? It is natural to suppose that estimate, by the head of the War Department, the Prophet and his four or five hundred asso- sets them down at about five thousand, more or ciates would never have calculated on coercing less, I suppose, as the case may be. But, supposthe Government of the United States out of much ing our three distinct armies to actually consist more than what was their just right to receive. of nine thousand men, exclusive of the sick, And, upon what authority was this war waged? (which will be found a very liberal estimate,) Was not our army collected and marched two or they do not then give you men enough to man three hundred miles, in a threatening manner, the guns in the works for the defence of the and without any declaration of war? And did Western frontier and seaports. The most of the not Governor Harrison plant his army in a me-six thousand men of the old army appear to be

« FöregåendeFortsätt »