« FöregåendeFortsätt »
“ Has god, thou fool! work'd solely for thy good,
“Know, Natures children all divide her care;
“Nor think, in NATURES STATE they blindly trod; The state of nature was the reign of god : Self-love and social at her birth began, ' Union the bond of all things, and of man. Pride then was not; nor arts, that pride to aid; Man walk'd with beast, joint tenant of the shade; The same his table, and the same his bed; No murder clothe'd him, and no murder fed .... Ah! how unlike the man of times to come! Of half that live the butcher and the tomb; Who, foe to nature, hears the general groan, Murders their species, and betrays his own,
But just disease to luxury succeeds,
* Popes Essay on man, epis. iii, v. 12, &c.
ANIMAL FOOD NOT NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSE OF STRENGTH OR CORPULENCY. ,
Among the many pretenceës to which men are driveën to defend or palliate a practice at which human nature, when divested of the habits and prejudiceës of society, would not fail to revolt, it is not one of the least trite and hackney'd, that, to such as are compeld or accụstom'd to a laborịous or active life, animal food is absolutely necessary, without which they would be allmost, if not alltogether, unable to discharge the dutys require'd in their respective stations. This, however, like the rest, is a mere naked assertion ; for which, at least, the onely argument that can be adduce'd is that men used to hard labour, or uncommon exertions, require a greater proportion of food, and that, perhap, of a more nutritive or substantial nature,
than those who are not: which, though an indisputable fact, wil, by no means, prove what it is brought to do.
Evidence of a satisfactory and convinceing nature has been allready adduce'd that, in what are cali'd the early ageës of mankind, the ufe of animal food was totally unknown; and that, in some countrys, it remains fo to this day: whence they are universally suppose'd to have been, at that period, a more stout, healthy, robust and active race, than has ever existed since animal food was adopted.
· Gluttony, luxury, and prejudice, no doubt, are not to be reafon'd with, It may, however, be demonstrateëd, that a vegetable diet is, fo får from being lefs, even much more, favorable and conducive to strength and vigour than animal food. It is wel known to be not the quantity of any thing takeën into the stomach, but the degree of nutriment derived from it, the quantity of chyle takeën up by the lacteals, and thence transmited into the fystem, to which the body is indebted for strength and vigour. That species of food, therefor, of which a giveën quantity produceës the greatest proportion of chyle, must, of course, be the most nutritious and invigorateing: and this appears to be the case with good wheaten-bread; which is fo justly term'd the staf of life, as being sufficient for all its purposeës. “ Some,” says doctor Cheyne, “ have affirm'd, that nothing but folid food can nourish, and that broths, soups, milk, and fuch aqueous food, weaken, waste and liquefy, the constitution and habit: but these are poor philosophers; for, in truth and realty, no food can nourish, i. 6. increase the quantity of Acíh and blood, [and] supply the waste of action and liveing, and the necessary secretions, but what is liquid and extremely thin, and whey wil nourish more quickly than beef, though not fo durerablely, as is known to every one who understands the animal economy. Let one swallow down what he wil, that part of it which nourish'd must be thiner and more fluid than the whey of affes milk; nay, possiblely, as thin as vapour, elfe it can never enter the lacteals (the onely passageës by which nourishment or new chyle can get into the blood), or, at least, pafs through some of the extremely minute canals, much less than a hair: the rest onely scratches for tickles) the palate, and the organs of sense, and poisons the world afterward."*