It is a familiar rule, that a thing may be within the letter of the statute and yet not within the statute, because not within its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers. The Northwestern Reporter - Sida 4541910Obegränsad förhandsgranskning - Om den här boken
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs - 1972 - 580 sidor
...Cases National Woodwork Mfrt. Asm. v. tfLRB 4-t* quiry into Congress' purpose in enacting the section. It is a "familiar rule, that a thing may be within...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers." Holy Trinity Church v. United Stales, 14.0 US 457, 459. That principle has particular application in... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare Committee - 1975 - 488 sidor
...must be interpreted in light of the statutory setting and the circumstances surrounding its enactment: "It is a 'familiar rule, that a thing may be within...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers.' Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 US 457, 459." National Woodwork Manufacturers Asm. v. NLRB,... | |
| Pennsylvania. Courts - 1923 - 936 sidor
...have officers who can make the prescribed reports? It is no less a cardinal principle of construction that "a thing may be within the letter of the statute...its spirit nor within the intention of its makers : " Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 US 457, 459. It is also settled that "a tax law cannot... | |
| Morris D. Forkosch - 1982 - 320 sidor
...decision in United Steelworkers of America v. Weber, 443 US 193, 201 (1979), quoting an 1892 case, 'that a thing may be within the letter of the statute...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers'. See also the Supreme Court's other reading of statutes, eg, as with the 1968 federal wiretapping statute... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1983 - 912 sidor
...to provide meaningful guidance to consumers in *° This Court has frequently relied on the principle that "a thing may be within the letter of the statute...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers." Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 US 457, 459 (1892). See, eg, Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 US... | |
| Marc I. Steinberg - 1984 - 1220 sidor
...judicious application of traditional legal canons of statutory construction may signify that an instrument "may be within the letter of the statute and yet not within the statute, because not within the spirit, nor within the intention of its makers."5 1 Marine Bank v. Weaver, 455 US 551, 555, 102... | |
| United States. Federal Communications Commission - 1997 - 608 sidor
...way when its application would result in an absurd outcome contrary to the clear intent of Congress: It is a familiar rule, that a thing may be within...its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers. ... If a literal construction of the words be absurd, the Act '.,iust be construed to avoid the absurdity.79... | |
| Leslie Friedman Goldstein - 1988 - 660 sidor
...against the background of its legislative history and historical context. As to the language of the PDA, "[i]t is a 'familiar rule, that a thing may be within...spirit, nor within the intention of its makers.'" Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 US 193,201 (1979) (quoting Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States,... | |
| |