 | Walter Malins Rose - 1920 - 1302 sidor
...for goods lost or damaged as limited by rates charged for transportation. Note, 8 N. 0. 0. A. 121. limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. Carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. Compensation for carriage is based upon that... | |
 | 1921 - 1186 sidor
...120 Cal. 156, § 50, infra. 40 LRA 350, 47 Pac. 874, 52 874 Such a limitation has, it has been said, no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence....carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on and the carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence.17 While it is true that the actual... | |
 | 1910 - 1050 sidor
...as to value, even where the loss or injury has occurred through the negligence of the carrier ; that the limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence; that it does not induce want of care, but exacts from the carrier the measure of care due ,to the value... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1260 sidor
...of the negligence of himself or his servants, said (p. 340, L. ed. p. 721, Sup. Ct. Rep. p. 15« ) : hound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value.... | |
 | 1801 - 518 sidor
...as to value, even where the loss or injury has occurred through the negligence of the carrier. * * * The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...negligence. The co'mpensation for carriage Is based upon that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value to greater. The aiticles have no... | |
 | 1892 - 556 sidor
...consideration; for, as stated by Blatchford, J., in Hart v. Railroad Co., 112 US 331, 340, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1 "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It does noi induce want of care. It exacts from the carriers the measure of care due to the value agreed on... | |
 | 1910 - 1336 sidor
...Hart v. Pennsylvania RR Co., 112 Ü. S. 331-340. 5 .Sup. Ct. 151, 156 (28 L. Ed. 717), the court said: "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed. The carrier is bound to respond In that valuation for negligence. The compensation for carriage is... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1915 - 1170 sidor
...obtaining the lower of two or more rates of charges propoy-/ tioned to the amount of the risk. * * * ' The limitation as to . , value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence.'// * * * The statutory liability, aside from responsibility for the default of a connecting carrier in... | |
 | Rhode Island. Supreme Court - 1893 - 950 sidor
...consideration. For, as stated by Blatchford, J., in Hart v. Pennsylvania RR Co. 112 US 331, 340, " The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligenceY It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carriers the measure of care due to... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1907 - 800 sidor
...by common carriers limiting liability are not ordinarily calculated to induce negligence, but exact from the carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on. But would it not be a very dangerous rule which permits care to be measured by value? It would lead... | |
| |
The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond in that value for Opinion of... 
