 | 1907
...contract price and the market price at the time when the goods ought to have been accepted by the buyer; or if no time was fixed for acceptance, then at the time of the refusal to accept. 7. Q. Define the strict scope of legal professional privilege, and mention some cases in which it does... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1916
...the absence of special circumstances, showing proximate damage of a greater amount, the difference between the contract price and the market or current...acceptance, then at the time of the refusal to accept." Hero we have laid down in unmistakable terms by statutory enactment the rights of the parties to a... | |
 | Business Training Corporation - 1916
...may bring an action for damages for non-acceptance, the usual measure of damages being the difference between the contract price and the market or current price at the time the goods ought to have been accepted. In England the second remedy is not allowed, nor is it in all... | |
 | 1917
...in the absence of special circumstances showing proximate damage of a greater amount, the difference between the contract price and the market or current...acceptance then at the time of the refusal to accept. (4.) If, while labor or expense of material amount are necessary on the part of the seller to enable... | |
 | Minnesota - 1917
...the absence of special circumstances, showing proximate damage of a greater amount, the difference between the contract price and the market or current...acceptance, then at the time of the refusal to accept. (4) If. while labor or expense of material amount are necessary on the part of the seller to enable... | |
 | Illinois - 1917
...the absence of special circumstances, showing proximate damage of a greater amount, the difference between the contract price and the market or current...acceptance, then at the time of the refusal to accept. (4) If, while labor or expense of material amount are necessary on the part of the seller to enable... | |
 | Minnesota - 1917
[ Sidan har tyvärr begränsat innehåll ] | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1917
...plaintiffs are entitled to recover damages, such damages are to be ascertained by taking the difference between the contract price and the market or current price at the time when the defendant ought to have accepted [the first, third and fourth] cars. . . . price at the time... | |
| |