 | Edward Voigt, Charles Voigt - 1904 - 836 sidor
...to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...some person under whom he claims acquired the title in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the... | |
 | Kentucky - 1904 - 384 sidor
...has negotiated the instrument was defective, the bnrden is on the holder to prove that He or sonic person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became hound on the instrument prior to... | |
 | Kentucky - 1904 - 378 sidor
...person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that ne or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. Hut the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior... | |
 | North Carolina, Thomas Brown Womack, Needham Y. Gulley, William R. Rodman - 1905 - 1412 sidor
...to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...bound on the instrument prior to the acquisition of §uch defective title. 1899, c. 733. s. 59. VIII. LIABILITY OF PARTIES. 2209. Maker's admissions and... | |
 | Michigan - 1905 - 754 sidor
...to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior to... | |
 | Robert Emmet Bunker, Michigan - 1905 - 392 sidor
...to be a holder in due course,1 but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course.2 But the last mentioned rule does not apply in THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW. favor of a party... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1905 - 982 sidor
...(Crawf., s. 98), when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated an instrument is defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that...claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. This case affirms what was the law in Iowa before the adoption of the Negotiable Instruments Law. Brown... | |
 | Albert Sidney Bolles - 1905 - 224 sidor
...to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...person under whom he claims acquired the title as holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favour of a party who became bound... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1906 - 442 sidor
...to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...prior to the acquisition of such defective title. Sec. 1364. LIABILITY OF MAKER. — The maker of a negotiable instrument, by making it, engages that he will... | |
 | Emilius Oviatt Randall - 1906 - 238 sidor
...to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the...acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior to... | |
| |
Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired... 
