HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

How to Read the Bible : A Guide to…
Loading...

How to Read the Bible : A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now (original 2007; edition 2008)

by James L. Kugel, Eric Fuentecilla (Cover designer)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
6841333,332 (4.42)69
73. How to Read the Bible : A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now by James L. Kugel
2007, 777 pages Paperback brick
read Nov 28, 2011 - Nov 17, 2015, read along with the OT
Rating: 4.5 stars

My plan was to use this as advertised, as a guide in how to read the bible. I would read part of the bible and then read the corresponding chapter here. It started out well. He has some nice introductory essays then chapters in order on Genesis 1-3, then on Gen 4, then 6-8, then Gen 11...and so on. But then at some point it started skipping larger and larger sections, with no explanation, and then sections began to be covered out of order, or different non-adjacent books were discussed together, or entire books were barely touched on, or the same book would be split into different, not even adjacent chapters. There is no explanation as to why some things are covered and other things aren't, or as to why the order goes scrambled. Anyway, it's not that kind of a guide in How to Read the Bible.

What this book actually intends is to summarize all the latest biblical scholarship and also to capture the various interpretations of the bible through time. His essays are quite interesting as he covers what the ancient and medieval interpreters thought, then he brings up the ideas of modern scholarship, including many of his own ideas. Some of the best parts of the book are in the end notes - there are 79 pages of them. In many essays he brings up some really interesting problems...and then he stops. No conclusion. The essays just end.

He is very interested in the changing interpretations through time, especially those within the bible itself. Such as how did Song of Songs, a romantic love song, become a biblical book seen as about love of God? It's possible the words never changed as it evolved from one meaning to the other.

For modern scholarship, his guiding lights are Julius Wellhausen who is the originator of the Documentary Hypothesis, Hermann Gunkel, and William F. Albright. In his conclusion he has some very interesting things to say about modern scholarship. It began as a effort to search under the text for an original and now mainly lost meaning. What was found instead is that the bible was written in parts over a long period of time, and has no original meaning or core. But the side effect of all this scholarship was the reducing of the text from a divine to a human creation. There was a entire shift from learning from the bible to learning about it. In the process the loser was the Bible. No longer a sacred emblem, the scholarly insight, while fascinating, remains of interest only to scholars - and everyone else interested in the origins.

What Kugel mentions, but neglects, is the literary criticism of the bible, a different kind of scholarship. In western literature throughout time the bible has kept its divine value. And the text itself has significant literary elements and studying them requires a different but still real reverence. Of course this a different kind of reverence, and not the one the bible once held.

He has few words for fundamentalists and basically says that anyone who has studied the bible and is aware of the biblical scholarship knows better than to see anything within the text other than a complex human creation.

2015 https://www.librarything.com/topic/197329#5368394 ( )
6 vote dchaikin | Dec 10, 2015 |
Showing 13 of 13
I might never have left Hebrew school if Dr. Kugel had been my guide through the Bible. Instead, I had a stream of European immigrants teach me the Bible and I caught up on my sleep instead. ( )
  MylesKesten | Jan 23, 2024 |
Highly readable introduction to biblical criticism, the key stories of the Hebrew Bible, and some of the interpretations, both Jewish and Christian, of it. It focuses on the first 5 books (Pentateuch) mostly - the 12 minor prophets get 1 chapter while Genesis-Deutoronomy gets 20, for example. There are a few chapters focusing on a few key issues in understanding - the difference between a physical god who intercedes and an omnipresent one, the documentary hypothesis (different sources identified by different letters and with different traditions were combined to form the Pentateuch), the context of the other religions in the Levant, the origins of biblical criticism and the contrast with classic interpretation. There's also discussions on other key topics woven into the "narrative" - ie lots on the role of prophets in Israelite society, some explanation of the impact of the Exile etc.

He ends with his own personal feelings and opinions on how revealing the origins of the Bible affects religion and his own beliefs (he is an Orthodox Jew), culminating in a defence of those beliefs and of the whole Jewish way of living a religious life - the scripture as the start of an attempt to live life being a servant to God, with the whole process of interpretation simply being an extension of that. He emphasises that the whole discipline started as a way to get closer to God by getting to an "original" Bible without later corruptions but that study just showed there's really no such thing - it's always been a hodgepodge amalgam of various traditions and texts and the religious significance only exists in terms of the later Bible combined with its long history of interpretation and commentary.

Of course, sometimes he presents certain conclusions as basically certainties when they're still a complicated topic in biblical scholarship (his explanation of the Cain and Abel tale stands out - not that it's "wrong" but AFAIK there's no real consensus on where they came from) but the whole narrative is so fascinating and is a great introduction to thinking more deeply about what the Bible is saying, where it comes from, how it was composed, the ideas that lay behind what people were writing. The emphasis on the etiological (stories of how something came to be) nature of the stories in Genesis is really fascinating - the idea that, say, the story of Jacob seeing a ladder to heaven was primarily about creating a non-"heathen" origin story for why Bethel was a major religious site. It's notable how genesis has a lot of "and that's why this place is called this" with a fanciful etymology - the power and importance these stories have always had on people is really fascinating to me. ( )
  tombomp | Oct 31, 2023 |
73. How to Read the Bible : A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now by James L. Kugel
2007, 777 pages Paperback brick
read Nov 28, 2011 - Nov 17, 2015, read along with the OT
Rating: 4.5 stars

My plan was to use this as advertised, as a guide in how to read the bible. I would read part of the bible and then read the corresponding chapter here. It started out well. He has some nice introductory essays then chapters in order on Genesis 1-3, then on Gen 4, then 6-8, then Gen 11...and so on. But then at some point it started skipping larger and larger sections, with no explanation, and then sections began to be covered out of order, or different non-adjacent books were discussed together, or entire books were barely touched on, or the same book would be split into different, not even adjacent chapters. There is no explanation as to why some things are covered and other things aren't, or as to why the order goes scrambled. Anyway, it's not that kind of a guide in How to Read the Bible.

What this book actually intends is to summarize all the latest biblical scholarship and also to capture the various interpretations of the bible through time. His essays are quite interesting as he covers what the ancient and medieval interpreters thought, then he brings up the ideas of modern scholarship, including many of his own ideas. Some of the best parts of the book are in the end notes - there are 79 pages of them. In many essays he brings up some really interesting problems...and then he stops. No conclusion. The essays just end.

He is very interested in the changing interpretations through time, especially those within the bible itself. Such as how did Song of Songs, a romantic love song, become a biblical book seen as about love of God? It's possible the words never changed as it evolved from one meaning to the other.

For modern scholarship, his guiding lights are Julius Wellhausen who is the originator of the Documentary Hypothesis, Hermann Gunkel, and William F. Albright. In his conclusion he has some very interesting things to say about modern scholarship. It began as a effort to search under the text for an original and now mainly lost meaning. What was found instead is that the bible was written in parts over a long period of time, and has no original meaning or core. But the side effect of all this scholarship was the reducing of the text from a divine to a human creation. There was a entire shift from learning from the bible to learning about it. In the process the loser was the Bible. No longer a sacred emblem, the scholarly insight, while fascinating, remains of interest only to scholars - and everyone else interested in the origins.

What Kugel mentions, but neglects, is the literary criticism of the bible, a different kind of scholarship. In western literature throughout time the bible has kept its divine value. And the text itself has significant literary elements and studying them requires a different but still real reverence. Of course this a different kind of reverence, and not the one the bible once held.

He has few words for fundamentalists and basically says that anyone who has studied the bible and is aware of the biblical scholarship knows better than to see anything within the text other than a complex human creation.

2015 https://www.librarything.com/topic/197329#5368394 ( )
6 vote dchaikin | Dec 10, 2015 |
This book forced reroutes of the synapses of my brain like none ever before. It is an 800 page cinder block that I was happy to carry around with me for precisely that reason. For 34 years I looked at the Bible one way, and from now until my last day, I'll be looking at it another way. NOT recommended for staunch believers in the 8th ikkar. You have been warned.
1 vote MartinBodek | Jun 11, 2015 |
fascinating. Told Jane about it. ( )
  njcur | Feb 13, 2014 |
I enjoyed this book immensely. Tells you what the bible says and provides historical context along with the various ways each story has been interpreted. Allowed me to understand how and why people continue to place such importance on something that archeologists, historians and biblical scholars have shown to be full of inconsistencies and factual inaccuracies. Author is an orthodox Jew, but presents material in a very balanced way even when it challenges his own beliefs. Drags at some points, but for the most part very interesting. ( )
  pjeanne | Oct 7, 2012 |
How to Read the Bible sort of straddles the line between books written for a general audience, and those of a more scholarly bent. Kugel explores the Hebrew Bible, looking both at the traditional rabbinic interpretations that were largely formulated around the first and second century BCE, and also at the modern scholars textual criticism, which asks who wrote this portion of the Bible, why did they write it, what happened to the text after it was first written, what sort of archeological support does it have, etc. It is not a comfortable book to read. For one who loves the Exodus story, and the popular image of King David (to mention just two examples) it is disheartening to read a book, with plenty of evidence to support its thesis, that most likely the whole Exodus story is fictional, and that King David was most likely a small time tribal warlord.

We end up with about five possible ways to read the Bible, and while the words may be the same, it is a different book depending on how one reads it. There is the Fundamentalist reading, which says that the Bible is a book of facts, and that nothing in it may be questioned. If scientific evidence, history, archeology, logic, etc contradict the Bible, then obviously science, history, archeology and logic are wrong, because the Bible can't be. There is the Rabbinic reading which says that everything in the Bible is sacred and conveys truth, but that truth is often concealed. The Bible is always true, but is not necessarily factual. There is the Textual Criticism view, which says the Bible is a fascinating book, written by dozens if not hundreds of different people over a period of around a thousand years, for many different audiences, with many different intents. The Bible is a book to be fascinated by, but not necessarily one we learn much from in regards to how we live our lives today. There is the Literary viewpoint, which accepts the textual criticism as valid, but is more interested in finding meaning in the Bible as we have it today, without regard to what the original authors intended, or what the ancient rabbis interpreted. And finally is Fictional view of the modern atheist. The Bible is just a bunch of meaningless ancient stories with no more meaning to them than the stories of the Greek gods.

Which of these views you have before reading this book will greatly affect how you react to it. I suspect those with the fundamentalist view would simply find this book blasphemous and offensive in the extreme, while those with the fictional view would not have the interest to read it in the first place. If you start with one of the other three viewpoints, then you should get something worthwhile from this text.

(Note: Although Kugel is an Orthodox Jew, he quite fairly points out throughout this book places where Christian interpretations are different from Jewish interpretations. It seems to me he conveys these extreme differences in interpretation in a fair and balanced manner. Only in the final chapter as he wraps things up does he lay out where he stands, and why, giving the arguments specifically for his own religious viewpoint.) ( )
2 vote fingerpost | Apr 2, 2011 |
I used this as a text in a home-school course for my high-school senior on "The Bible as Literature". It served very well for that, combining respect for the text, respect for scholarship and a sense of humour that resulted in a finely balanced gravitas that set just the right tone.

Any disappointment I had was due to my wish that the author had considered other or additional passages--I never found shortcomings in the passages he did treat.

And my favorite part: Describing the Garden of Eden story, Kugel describes how Christianity came to treat the serpent in the garden as Satan, but in the text, Kugel reminds us, "he's just another talking snake." ( )
  steve.clason | Jun 3, 2010 |
Really a very beautiful guide to Biblical scholarship that should interest any thoughtful person. I got a little bored with some of the stuff about prophets, but the great majority of the book is excellent.
  leeinaustin | Nov 23, 2008 |
This book is quite a tome, but Kugel is an excellent writer. His point is that, yes, modern Biblical scholarship is probably correct in many or most statements, but that this misses the point: The Bible was put together to advance certain viewpoints and when you read the Bible you need to understand the assumptions that go into reading it in a certain way. So in addition to the words of the Bible you need to understand why the ancient interpreters actually interpreted it this way. This interpretation makes the Bible what it is. So things like 'Original Sin' are really not supported by the Bible text per se, but are rather part of the what the Ancient Interpreters wanted the Bible to mean.

Very well researched and interesting. I agree with what he writes, except that he seems to think that somehow the words of the Bible plus the ancient interpretations make it into a holy book. I cannot follow that. Instead his detailed analysis suggests to me that the Bible was written and put together from several sources to advance certain viewpoints, but it is completely up to the reader to accept or reject these viewpoints. They are not supported by the text of the Bible. In addition, in re-reading some of the stories of the old testament (after a long time not looking at them), they appear even more fantastical and some instances ridiculous. And the ancient interpreters really went through some mental gymnastics to make some of characters appear better than they really were.

But these are personal conclusions, and a believer may come to different ones. However, Kugel clearly points out that the modern scholarship on the Bible and the usual interpretations (based on the ancient interpreters) are irreconcilable. So, if you want to believe in the Bible you need to read as a book of 'how to serve God' and on some level make a leap of faith. This will work for some believers and he does his best to make both the stance of the believer and the skeptic intellectually respectable.

Kugel has a very refreshing writing style and he will never push his viewpoint or insult the readers intelligence, so although Kugel clearly is a believer, this book is an enjoyable read for both believers and skeptics. ( )
2 vote yapete | Jul 1, 2008 |
James L. Kugel, a Harvard professor of religion and an Orthodox Jew, has written an exceptionally lucid analysis of the Hebrew Bible itself (the "Old Testamtent," as it was taught to me) as well analyses of modern biblical research and the interpretations given to it by the ancient interpreters of the 3rd through 1st centuries B.C.E.

Modern research has shown that the current text of the Bible is the result of much changing and editing of the orginal stories, which editing took place primarily during that same 3rd through 1st centruies B.C.E. Moreover, the original stories were even less literally believable to a modern reader than their current redacted form.

Kugel urges the reader to read the Bible not as it was originally written, but how it came to be. Most of the major changes in the meaning of the Bible took place without actually changing the original words, but by changing the meaning given to them. Thus the Song of Songs was originally an erotic hymn to a human lover, but it was recast (without changing the words themselves) to a description of God's relationship with his chosen people.

Some interesting conclusions of modern scholarship: The ancient Israelites were monolatrists, not monotheists. That is, they believed in the existence of other gods, like Baal, but they thought they were to worship only their tribal god, YHWH. There is no archeological evidence of a conquest of Canaan; rather it seem that the Israelites may have won a few battles with the indigenous people of Palestine, but absorbed them rather than thoroughy vanquishing them. Not only is the flood story borrowed from earlier Mesopotamian myths, but even the language of the story seems copied from earlier sources. Even David and Saul (let alone Abraham and the earliest Biblical figures) may not have been real people. The story of the Covenant on Mount Sinai borrows its form and structure from earlier Assyrian vassal treaties, with God assuming the role of the suzerain.

Despite being aware that little in the Bible is "true," Kugel argues that it may still be taken seriously. The Bible became the manual of behavior for the Jewish people, and one can believe (if one needs to) that at least some (but probably not all) was divinely inspired. Nevertheless, Kugel concludes that "modern biblical scholarship and traditional Judaism are and must always remain completely irreconcilable." He chooses to read the Bible as what it came to mean during the editing process, irrespective of how it got to be that way.

I think Kugel's perspective may be the only way to read the Bible and keep religious faith. I prefer the modern scholarship approach, finding it to be a very human document with many inconsistacies, absurdities, and down right evil examples of behavior described as ordered by God. Also the idea of the Jews as the chosen people of a transcendent God (as opposed to their original tribal god) seems patently silly.

I thank Kugel for a wonderful book, one that should be required reading in every Baptist seminary.

(JAB) ( )
3 vote nbmars | Dec 28, 2007 |
6
  OberlinSWAP | Aug 1, 2015 |
Don't worry, I haven't gone all religious on you. It's supposed to be a book about modern biblical research, which is which parts of the bible were written at which time and what did they mean to the people then"",5/11/2008 15:16
Mencken: A Life,Fred Hobson,5/14/2008 18:46,394563298,,,0,,5/14/2008 18:46
Disturber of the Peace: The Life of H.L. Mencken,William Manchester,5/14/2008 18:47,870235435,,,0,,5/14/2008 18:47
The Vintage Mencken,H.L. Mencken,5/14/2008 18:48,679728953,,,0,,5/14/2008 18:48
The Commitment: Love ( )
  snoozebar | Jan 7, 2009 |
Showing 13 of 13

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.42)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 5
3.5 1
4 11
4.5 7
5 25

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 203,217,344 books! | Top bar: Always visible